Environmental Values 15(2006): 315-320. doi: 10.3197/096327106778226301
A response to conference papers by Brady, Phillips, and Rolston on aesthetics and environmentalism, this essay argues that sound environmental policy might begin with basic questions about the purpose and extent of human life, for such policies shape human nature as they also shape the phenomenal world. Decisions based upon short-lived economic conditions cannot provide those long-term benefits necessary for the preservation of the environment. Aesthetic judgments, because they are reflective, help us anthropomorphise ourselves; along with scientific judgments, they might serve as foundational, rather than auxiliary, practices for determining the future of our finite planet.
KEYWORDS: Aesthetics, ethics, disinterestedness, life forms, environmentalism
REFERENCES to other articles in Environmental Values:
Aesthetics in Practice: Valuing the Natural World. Emily Brady
Thoreau's Aesthetics and 'The Domain of the Superlative'.Dana Phillips
Caring for Nature: What Science and Economics Can't Teach Us but Religion Can. Holmes Rolston, III
Download full text (PDF format) from IngentaConnect. Access is free if your institution subscribes to Environmental Values.
Subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.Other papers in this volume
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222