Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022)
Peer Reviewed Articles

Remittance Flows and the Environmental Degradation–Migration Nexus

PDF
  • Travis Edwards
Travis Edwards
University of Kansas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/JPS.63788304908975

Published 2022-08-07

Keywords

  • Environmental Economics,
  • Migration Policy,
  • Remittances,
  • Population Growth

How to Cite

Edwards, Travis. 2022. “Remittance Flows and the Environmental Degradation–Migration Nexus”. The Journal of Population and Sustainability 6 (2):31-48. https://doi.org/10.3197/JPS.63788304908975.

Copyright (c) 2022 Travis Edwards

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The net effect on the environment from migration into developed countries has received little attention in existing literature. Yet, this issue has important policy implications – e.g., nativists’ support of anti-immigration policy for achieving pollution reduction targets. This research uses panel data for 127 countries from years 1971–2012 to analyse how migration affects greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through remittance flows. The findings suggest higher remittances lead to lower GHG emissions. Further, the estimated decrease in GHG emissions more than compensates for any potential increase in global GHG emissions from migration into developed countries. These results suggest that pollution alone does not justify policies restricting immigration.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Adams Jr, R.H. 2006. ‘International remittances and the household: Analysis and review of global evidence’. Journal of African Economies 15 (suppl_2): 396–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/jafeco/ejl028
  2. Ahmad, M. et al. 2019. ‘Does the inflow of remittances cause environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from China’. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 32 (1): 2099–2121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1642783
  3. Amega, K. 2018. ‘Remittances, education and health in Sub-Saharan Africa’. Cogent Economics & Finance 6 (1): 1516488. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1516488
  4. Askarov, Z. and H. Doucouliagos. 2020. ‘A meta-analysis of the effects of remittances on household education expenditure’. World Development 129: 104860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104860
  5. Atasoy, B.S. 2017. ‘Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across the US: Evidence from panel mean group estimators’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 77: 731–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.050
  6. Balsalobre-Lorente, D., K.K. Gokmenoglu, N.Taspinar et al. 2019. ‘An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries’. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26: 23010–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x
  7. Beine, M., F. Docquier and M. Schiff. 2013. ‘International migration, transfer of norms and home country fertility’. Canadian Journal of Economics, 46 (4): 1406–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12062
  8. Cafaro, P. and F. Götmark. 2019.‘The potential environmental impacts of EU immigration policy: future population numbers, greenhouse gas emissions and
  9. Davis, J. and D. Lopez-Carr. 2010. ‘The effects of migrant remittances on population-environment dynamics in migrant origin areas: International migration, fertility, and consumption in highland Guatemala’. Population and Environment 32 (2): 216–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0128-7
  10. Ehrlich, P.R. and J.P. Holdren. 1971. ‘Impact of population growth’. Science, New Series 171 (3997): 1212–17. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212
  11. Franklin, R.S. and M. Ruth. 2012. ‘Growing up and cleaning up: the environmental Kuznets curve redux’ Applied Geography 32 (1): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.014
  12. Garsous, G. and T. Ko´zluk. 2017. ‘Foreign direct investment and the pollution haven hypothesis: Evidence from listed firms’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers (1379): 1–35. Available at: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/2131.pdf?q=pollution-haven-hypothesis.
  13. Grossman, G.M. and A.B. Krueger. 1995. ‘Economic growth and the environment’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (2): 353–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
  14. Gyimah-Brempong, K. and E. Asiedu. 2015. ‘Remittances and investment in education: Evidence from Ghana’, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 24 (2): 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2014.881907
  15. Heilmann, C. 2006. ‘Remittances and the migration – development nexus – Challenges for the sustainable governance of migration’. Ecological Economics 59 (2): 231–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.037
  16. Khan, Z.U., M. Ahmad and A. Khan. 2020. ‘On the remittances-environment led hypothesis: Empirical evidence from BRICS economies’. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (14): 16460–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07999-8
  17. List, J.A. and C.A. Gallet. 1999. ‘The environmental Kuznets curve: does one size fit all?’ Ecological Economics 31 (3): 409–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00064-6
  18. Ma, G. and E. Hofmann. 2019. ‘Population, immigration, and air quality in the USA: a spatial panel study’. Population and Environment 40 (3): 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-018-0311-9
  19. Meadows, D.H., D.L. Meadows, J. Randers and W.W. Behrens III. 1972. The Limits to Growth: a Report to the Club of Rome. https://doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.1
  20. Naufal, G.S. and C. Vargas-Silva. 2009. ‘Changing fertility preferences one migrant at a time: The impact of remittances on the fertility rate’, IZA Discussion Paper 4066: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1369812
  21. Oldekop, J.A. et al. 2018. ‘An upside to globalization: International outmigration drives reforestation in Nepal’. Global Environmental Change 52: 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.06.004
  22. Paul, F.H. et al. 2019. ‘The impact of remittances on fertility rate: Evidence from Pakistan’. Sindh University Research Journal – Science Series 51 (01): 129–34. https://doi.org/10.26692/sujo/2019.01.23
  23. Price, C. and B. Feldmeyer. 2011. ‘The environmental impact of immigration: An analysis of the effects of immigrant concentration on air pollution levels’. Population Research and Policy Review 31 (1): 119–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-011-9216-3
  24. Ratha, D. 2020. ‘Remittances: Funds for the folks back home’. Finance and Development. International Monetary Fund. Available at https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/remitt.htm
  25. Ratha, D., S. De, S. Plaza, K. Schuettler, W. Shaw, H. Wyss, S. Yi. 2016. ‘Migration and Remittances – Recent Developments and Outlook’ Migration and Development Brief 26, Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi/org/10.1596/ 978-1-4648-0913-2
  26. Rupasingha, A., S.J. Goetz, D.L. Debertin and A. Pagoulatos. 2004. ‘The environmental Kuznets curve for US counties: A spatial econometric analysis with extensions’. Papers in Regional Science 83 (2): 407–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.2004.tb01915.x
  27. Shafik, N. and S. Bandyopadhyay. 1992. Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time-Series and Cross-country Evidence. World Bank Publications.
  28. Sharma, K., B. Bhattarai and S. Ahmed. 2019. ‘Aid, growth, remittances and carbon emissions in Nepal’. Energy Journal 40 (October): 129–41. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.40.1.ksha
  29. Squalli, J. 2010. ‘An empirical assessment of U.S. state-level immigration and environmental emissions’. Ecological Economics 69 (5):1170–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.01.001
  30. United Nations. 2015. International Migration Report. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
  31. Weber, H. and J. Sciubba. 2018. ‘The effect of population growth on the environment: Evidence from European regions’. European Journal of Population 35 (2): 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9486-0
  32. The World Bank. 2020a. ‘Total greenhouse gas emissions’. World Development Indicators. Available at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.GHGT.KT.CE
  33. The World Bank. 2020b. ‘Fertility rate, total (births per woman)’. World Development Indicators. Available at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN
  34. York, R., E.A. Rosa and T. Dietz. 2003. ‘A rift in modernity? Assessing the anthropogenic sources of global climate change with the STIRPAT model’. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330310790291