Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Research

Nuclear Clay: Prerequisites for Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste in Soviet Lithuania and Russia

PDF HTML
  • Andrei Stsiapanau
Andrei Stsiapanau
VMU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/whpww.63857928646676
Categories

Published 2025-02-05

Keywords

  • nuclear waste,
  • geology,
  • Soviet nuclear program,
  • Russia,
  • nuclear safety actor

How to Cite

Stsiapanau, A. (2025). Nuclear Clay: Prerequisites for Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste in Soviet Lithuania and Russia. Worldwide Waste, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3197/whpww.63857928646676

Copyright (c) 2025 Andrei Stsiapanau

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Amidst a period marked by growing volumes of nuclear waste and ongoing discussions regarding its management, technologies that utilise natural materials for containment are gaining prominence. This article takes a historical view of Russian nuclear waste management practices with a focus on the role of clay as a natural material for containing nuclear waste. In particular, it explores the use of clay in multi-barrier technology, highlighting its dual role as a protective layer and a resource for managing nuclear safety risks. The siting of the liquid nuclear waste disposal at the Ignalina NPP site in Lithuania (1976–1980) and of solid nuclear waste disposal at Leningrad NPP in Sosnovy Bor, Russia (2013–2018) are the main foci of this article. These cases contribute to understanding nuclear waste disposal siting in the USSR and modern Russia and enable analysis of nuclear waste discourses describing the sites’ geology as a static or dynamic environment within active or passive safety systems.

PDF HTML

References

  1. Anderson, E., V. Savonenkov and S. Shabalev. 2012. Clays as an Argillaceous Medium for Radioactive Waste Isolation (St. Petersburg: Rosatom).
  2. Balukova, V. et al. 2020. ‘Mainstreams in the radioactive waste management in the USSR’, IAEA-CN 42: 167–80.
  3. Barry, A. 2013. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons).
  4. Barthe, Y., M. Elam and G. Sundqvist. 2020. ‘Technological fix or divisible object of collective concern? Histories of conflict over the geological disposal of nuclear waste in Sweden and France’, Science as Culture 29 (2):196–218.
  5. Bensaude-Vincent, B. and I. Stengers. 1996. The History of Chemistry (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996).
  6. Bergaya, F. and G.Lagaly. 2006. ‘General introduction: Clays, clay minerals, and clay science’, in F. Bergaya, K.G. Theng and G. Lagaly (eds), Developments in Clay Science (Elsevier, 2006), pp. 1–18.
  7. Bol’shov, L., N. Lavernov and I. Linge. 2015. Problemy iadernogo naslediia i puti ikh resheniia. Vyvod iz èxpluatatsii vol. 3 [The problems of the nuclear legacy and its possible solutions] (Moscow: IBRAE, 2015).
  8. Bolotova, A. 2004. ‘Colonization of Nature in the Soviet Union. State ideology, public discourse, and the experience of geologists’, Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 29 (3): 104–23.
  9. Cotton, M. 2017. Nuclear Waste Politics (London: Routledge) p. 95.
  10. Dodd, Ch. K. 1994. Industrial Decision-Making and High-Risk Technology: Siting Nuclear Power Facilities in the USSR (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield).
  11. Eldina, E. 2005. ‘Methods of processing and disposal of toxic waste at the Krasny Bor landfill’, Journal of Mining Institute 159 (1): 40–42.
  12. Evstratov, E. et al. 2012. Problemy iadernogo naslediia i puti ikh resheniia vol. 1 [The problems of the nuclear legacy and its possible solutions] (Moscow: IBRAE, 2012)
  13. Groopman, E. 2018. ‘Discovery of fissionogenic Cs and Ba capture five years after Oklo reactor shutdown’, PNAS 115 (35): 8676–81.
  14. Hamblin, J. 2008. Poison in the Well. Radioactive Waste in the Oceans at the Dawn of the Nuclear Age (New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 2008).
  15. Hecht, G. 2006. ‘Nuclear ontologies’, Constellations 13 (3): 320–31.
  16. Hecht, G. 2011. Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technologies in the Global Cold War (MIT Press, 2011).
  17. Hecht, G. 2012. Being Nuclear (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  18. Hecht, G. 2018.‘Interstellar vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On waste, temporality, and violence’, Cultural Anthropology 33 (1):109–41.
  19. Högselius, P. 2010. ‘The decay of Communism: Managing spent nuclear fuel in the Soviet Union, 1937–1991’, Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1 (4): 83–109.
  20. IAEA. 1983. Criteria for Underground Disposal of Solid Radioactive Wastes, IAEA Safety Series 60 (Vienna: 1983).
  21. Irwin, A., 2003. Sociology and the Environment. A Critical Introduction to Society, Nature, and Knowledge (Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 2003).
  22. Jaitner, F. 2018. ‘A profitable business strategy? Spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste management in Russia’, in A. Brunnengräber and M.R. Di Nucci (eds), Challenges of Nuclear Waste Governance. An International Comparison 2 (Berlin: Springer VS), pp. 51–72.
  23. Kasperski, T. 2019. ‘From legacy to heritage: The changing political and symbolic status of military waste in Russia’, Cahiers du Monde Russe 60 (2–3): 517–41.
  24. Kasperski, T. and A. Stsiapanau. 2022. ‘Building trust in nuclear energy in a non-democratic context: the public, industry and nuclear waste in contemporary Russia’, Journal of Risk Research 25 (5): 648–65.
  25. Korkutis, V. 1971. The Cambrian Deposits of the Baltic Sea Basin’s Area (Vilnius: Mintis).
  26. Krütli, P. et al. 2010. ‘Functional-dynamic public participation in technological decision-making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories’, Journal of Risk Research 13 (7): 861–75.
  27. Landström, C. and A. Bergmans. 2015. ‘Long-term repository governance: A socio-technical challenge,’ Journal of Risk Research 18 (3): 378–91.
  28. Lehtonen, M. 2010. ‘Opening up or closing down radioactive waste management policy? Debates on reversibility and retrievability in Finland, France, and the United Kingdom’, Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1 (4): 139–79.
  29. Lidskog, R. and G. Sundqvist. 2004. ‘On the right track? Technology, geology, and society in Swedish nuclear waste management’, Journal of Risk Research 7 (2): 251–268, at 252.
  30. Linge, I. et al. 2015. Osobyye radioaktivnyye othody [Special radioactive waste] (Moscow: SAM poligrafist, 2015); A. Izotova et al., ‘Rol prirodnyh I inzhenernyh barrier pri zahoronenii radioaktivnyh othodov’ [The role of natural and engineering barriers in disposal radioactive waste], Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University 7 (4):110–23.
  31. MacFarlane, A. 2003. ‘Underlying Yucca Mountain: The interplay of geology and policy in nuclear waste disposal’, Social Studies of Science 33 (5): 783–807.
  32. Maloney-Dunn, K.M. 1993. ‘Russia’s nuclear waste law: A response to the legacy of environmental abuse in the former Soviet Union’, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 10 (2): 365–430.
  33. Maslennikov, I., E. Anderson, V. Savonenkov et al. 2010. ‘Geological factors determining the safety of the disposal in primary clay deposits of the Leningrad Region’, 5th International Nuclear Forum Proceedings, English version (Saint-Petersburg: Atomprof), pp.193–99.
  34. Miller, W.M., W.R. Alexander, N.A. Chapman, I.G. McKinley and J.A.T. 2001. Smellie, Geological Disposal of Radioactive Wastes and Natural Analogues (Oxford: Pergamon Press).
  35. Mironova, A., E. Molsky and V. Rumynin. 2006. ‘Transboundary problems in the exploitation of groundwater in the region of the Russia-Estonia state border (on the example of the Lomonosov-Voronkov aquifer)’, Water Resources 33 (4): 1–10.
  36. Murray, H. 1991. ‘Overview – clay mineral applications’, Applied Clay Science 5 (5–6): 379–95.
  37. Norris, S., E. Neeft and M. Van Geet. 2019. Multiple Roles of Clays in Radioactive Waste Confinement (Geological Society, London: Special Publications, 2019).
  38. Proskuryakov, V., Y. Nikolaev, G. Stuckey et al. 1998. ‘The geological environment of the Leningrad region and St. Petersburg and its importance in solving economic and social problems’, Exploration and Protection of Mineral Resources 7-8: 21–23.
  39. Rindzevičiūtė, E., L. Dovydaitytė and T. Kasperski. 2025. ‘Challenging entangled colonialisms: Nuclear cultural heritage in the post-Communist space’, in C. Hill, J. Hogg and R. Kaur (eds), Fallout Reframed: Rethinking Nuclearity from Below (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, forthcoming 2025).
  40. Rinkevicius, L. 2000. ‘Transitional economies: Ecological modernisation as cultural politics: Transformations of civic environmental activism in Lithuania’, Environmental Politics 9 (1): 171–202.
  41. Rumynin, V., E. Sergeev, E. Pankina et al. 2010. ‘Geotechnical, flow and transport properties of Kotlin (Vendian age) and Blue (Cambrian age) clays with respect to design of underground storage facilities for radioactive waste disposal in the North-West region of Russia’, 5th International Nuclear Forum Proceedings, Russian version (Saint-Petersburg: Atomprof), pp. 195–210.
  42. Rumynin, V., K. Vladimirov, A. Nikulenkov et al. 2021. ‘The status and trends in radioactive contamination of groundwater at an LLW-ILW storage facility site near Sosnovy Bor (Leningrad region, Russia)’, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 237: 106707.
  43. Schmid, S. 2015. Producing Power. The Pre-Chernobyl History of the Soviet Nuclear Industry (Boston: MIT Press).
  44. Schröder, J. 2015. ‘Geological disposal of radioactive waste: A long-term socio-technical experiment’, Science Engineering Ethics 22 (3): 685–705, at 687.
  45. Schröder, J., N. Rossignol and M. Van Oudheusden. 2016. ‘Safety in long-term radioactive waste management: Insight and oversight’, Safety Science 85: 261.
  46. Schürkmann, C. 2022. ‘Joining multiple collaborations: Toward a sociomaterial perspective on nuclear waste management between society, technology and nature’, Worldwide Waste: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 5 (1): 1–16.
  47. Sorokin, V., A. Demin, V. Kashcheev et al. 2010. ‘Results of pre-design development of options for the creation of radioactive waste final isolation points in the North-West region of the Russian Federation’, 5th International Nuclear Forum Proceedings (Saint-Petersburg: Atomprof), pp. 73–75.
  48. Stsiapanau, A. 2021. ‘Nuclear energy in transition: The Ignalina nuclear power plant from Soviet to Lithuanian rule’, in S. Liubimau and B. Cope (eds), Re-tooling Knowledge Infrastructures in a Nuclear Town (Vilnius: Academy of Arts Press), pp. 44–57.
  49. Stulberg, A. 2004. ‘The Federal politics of importing spent nuclear fuel: Inter-branch bargaining and oversight in the new Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies 56 (4): 491–520.
  50. Turner, J.P. T. W. Berry, M. J. Bowman and N.A. Chapman. 2023. ‘Role of the geosphere in deep nuclear waste disposal – An England and Wales perspective’, Earth-Science Reviews 242 : 104445.
  51. Yudin, F. et al. 1968. ‘Opyt zahoroneniya zhidkih radioaktivnyh othodov v glubinnye geologicheskie formacii [Cases of liquid radioactive waste disposal in deep geomedium]’, Atomnaya energiya 25 (2): 128–32.
  52. Ziegler, C. and H. Lyon. 2002. ‘The politics of nuclear waste in Russia’, Problems of Post-Communism 49 (4): 33–42.
  53. Zinoviev, G. and V. Chembura. 2019. ‘Some aspects of final insulation of radiation wastes in Russia’, Global Nuclear Safety 2 (31): 110–22.