Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017)
Articles

A call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss

Niki Rust
Bio
Laura Kehoe
University of Victoria
Bio
This image of the cover of this issue of The Journal of Population and Sustainability has the title in block letters on a grey-green background.

Published 2017-05-01

Keywords

  • family planning,
  • fertility,
  • overconsumption,
  • overpopulation,
  • population growth,
  • population health and environment
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Rust, N., & Kehoe, L. (2017). A call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss. The Journal of Population and Sustainability, 1(2), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.3197/jps.2017.1.2.53

Abstract

The world is changing more quickly now than it ever has before, predominantly due to our large consumption rates and population size. Despite this epoch being well-accepted as the 'Anthropocene', it is surprising that there is still a lack of willingness by many conservation scientists to engage with the consequences of human population dynamics on biodiversity. We highlight the importance of addressing the effects of our population abundance, density and growth rate on conservation and note that environmental organisations are beginning to embrace this problem but the take-up amongst conservation researchers to empirically study their effect on biodiversity is slow. We argue that the lack of published research may partly be because the topic is still considered taboo. We therefore urge conservation scientists to direct more of their research efforts on this issue, particularly to examples that highlight the effects of Population, Health and Environment (PHE) projects and female education initiatives on biodiversity.

References

  1. All Party Parliamentary Group on Population Development and Reproductive Health, 2007. Return of the population growth factor: its impact upon the millennium development goals, London, UK. Available at: http://www.populationconnection.org/site/DocServer/Return_of_the_Population_Growth_Factor.pdf?docID=224.
  2. Allen, R.H., 2007. The role of family planning in poverty reduction. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110(5), pp.999–1002.
  3. Barnosky, A.D. et al., 2011. Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature, 471(7336), pp.51–57. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09678.
  4. Bernstein, L., 2014. Endangered species condoms: ‘safe intercourse saves the dwarf seahorse.’ The Washington Post, [online] Available at: [Accessed 24 March 2017].
  5. Bobbink, R., Hornung, M. and Roelofs, J., 1998. The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. Journal of Ecology, 86(5), pp.717–738.
  6. Brashares, J.S., Arcese, P. and Sam, M.K., 2001. Human demography and reserve size predict wildlife extinction in west Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268(1484), pp.2473–2478.
  7. Brewer, T.D. et al., 2013. Effects of human population density and proximity to markets on coral reef fishes vulnerable to extinction by fishing. Conservation Biology, 27(3), pp.443–452.
  8. Bulte, E.H. and Horan, R.D., 2015. Does human population growth increase wildlife harvesting? an economic assessment. Journal of Wildlife Management, 66(3), pp.574–580.
  9. Burgess, N. et al., 2007. Correlations among species distributions, human density and human infrastructure across the high biodiversity tropical mountains of Africa. Biological Conservation, 134(2), pp.164–177, [online] Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006320706003326 [Accessed March 18, 2012].
  10. Butler, C.D., 2004. Human carrying capacity and human health. PLoS medicine, 1(3), p.e55, [online] Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=539046&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [Accessed January 15, 2015].
  11. Cahill, A.E. et al., 2013. How does climate change cause extinction? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1750), p.20121890, [online] Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3574421&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [Accessed July 11, 2014].
  12. Caro, T. et al., 2012. Conservation in the anthropocene. Conservation Biology, 26(1), pp.185–8, [online]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22010798 [Accessed September 29, 2014].
  13. Chown, S. and Rensburg, B. van, 2003. Energy, species richness, and human population size: conservation implications at a national scale. Ecological Applications, 13(5), pp.1233–1241.
  14. Cinner, J.E. et al., 2009. Linking social and ecological systems to sustain coral reef fisheries. Current Biology, 19(3), pp.206–12, [online] Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19211057 [Accessed November 26, 2014].
  15. Cleland, J. et al., 2006. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet, 368(9549), pp.1810–27, [online] Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17113431 [Accessed January 12, 2015].
  16. Corlett, R., 2015. The Anthropocene concept in ecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30(1), pp.36–41, [online] Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534714002262 [Accessed December 4, 2014].
  17. Crutzen, P.J. and Stoermer, E.F., 2000. The “Anthropocene.” IGBP, Newsletter, 41, pp.17–18.
  18. Darroch, J.E. and Singh, S., 2013. Trends in contraceptive need and use in developing countries in 2003, 2008, and 2012: an analysis of national surveys. The Lancet, 381(9879), pp.1756–1762, [online] Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60597-8.
  19. Dextrase, A.J. and Mandrak, N.E., 2006. Impacts of alien invasive species on freshwater fauna at risk in canada. Biological Invasions, 8(1), pp.13–24, [online] Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-005-0232-2 [Accessed August 20, 2014].
  20. Dietz, T., Rosa, E. and York, R., 2007. Driving the human ecological footprint. Frotiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5(1), pp.13–18, [online] Available at: http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5%5B13:DTHEF%5D2.0.CO%3B2 [Accessed January 15, 2015].
  21. Ehrlich, P. and Ehrlich, A.H., 1990. The population explosion, New York: Simon and Schuster.
  22. Ellis, E.C. and Ramankutty, N., 2008. Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(8), pp.439–447.
  23. Estes, A.B. et al., 2012. Land-cover change and human population trends in the greater Serengeti ecosystem. Biological Conservation, 147(1), pp.255–263, [online] Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006320712000237 [Accessed August 20, 2014].
  24. Gehrt, S., 1996. The human population problem: educating and changing behavior. Conservation Biology, 10(3), pp.900–903.
  25. Gerland, P. et al., 2014. World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science, 346(6206), pp.234–237.
  26. Hahn, S., 2011. Linking population, health, and the environment: an overview of integrated programs and a case study in nepal. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 78, pp.394–405.
  27. Harris, A. et al., 2012. Integrating family planning service provision into community-based marine conservation. Oryx, 46(2), pp.179–186.
  28. Holl, K.D. et al., 1999. Knowledge of and attitudes toward population growth and the environment: university students in Costa Rica and the United States. Environmental Conservation, 26(1), pp.66–74.
  29. Huber, M. and Knutti, R., 2012. Anthropogenic and natural warming inferred from changes in Earth’s energy balance. Nature Geoscience, 5, pp.31–36.
  30. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: working group i contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change T. Stocker et al., eds., New York: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Jha, S. and Bawa, K.S., 2006. Population growth, human development, and deforestation in biodiversity hotspots. Conservation Biology, 20(3), pp.906–912, [online] Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00398.x [Accessed March 27, 2012].
  32. Johns, D.M., 2003. Growth, conservation, and the necessity of new alliances. Conservation Biology, 17(5), pp.1229–1237.
  33. Kay, C.E., 1997. The ultimate tragedy of commons. Conservation Biology, 11(6), pp.1447–1448.
  34. King, E.M. and Hill, M.A., 1993. Women’s education in developing countries: barriers, benefits, and policies, Washington D.C.: The John Hopkins University Press.
  35. King, M. and Elliott, C., 1997. To the point of farce: a Martian view of the Hardinian taboo – the silence that surrounds population control. British Medical Journal, 315(120), p.1441, [online] Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2127875/ [Accessed January 15, 2015].
  36. Limburg, K.E. et al., 2011. Human population increase, economic growth, and fish conservation: collision course or savvy stewardship? Fisheries, 36(1), pp.27–35, [online] Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1577/03632415.2011.10389053 [Accessed January 15, 2015].
  37. Luck, G.W., 2007. A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity. Biological Reviews, 82(4), pp.607–645.
  38. Lutz, W., Butz, W.P. and KC, S., 2014. World population and human capital in the twenty-first century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. Lutz, W., Sanderson, W. and Scherbov, S., 2001. The end of world population growth. Nature, 412(6846), pp.543–5.
  40. Mackenzie, C. a. and Hartter, J., 2013. Demand and proximity: drivers of illegal forest resource extraction. Oryx, 47(02), pp.288–297.
  41. Maher, T., 1997. How and why journalists avoid the population-environment connection. Population and Environment, 18(4), pp.339–372, [online] Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02208512 [Accessed January 15, 2015].
  42. McKee, J., Chambers, E. and Guseman, J., 2013. Human population density and growth validated as extinction threats to mammal and bird species. Human Ecology, 41(5), pp.773–778.
  43. McKinney, M.L., 2001. Role of human population size in raising bird and mammal threat among nations. Animal Conservation, 4(1), pp.45–57, [online] Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1017/S1367943001001056.
  44. Meffe, G., 1994. Human population control: the missing awareness. Conservation Biology, 8(1), pp.310–313.
  45. Meffe, G.K., Ehrlich, A.H. and Ehrenfeld, D., 1993. Human population control: the missing agenda. Conservation Biology, 7(1), pp.1–3.
  46. Murtaugh, P.A. and Schlax, M.G., 2009. Reproduction and the carbon legacies of individuals. Global Environmental Change, 19(1), pp.14–20.
  47. Parks, S.A. and Harcourt, A.H., 2002. Reserve size, local human density, and mammalian extinctions in U.S. protected areas. Conservation Biology, 16(3), pp.800–808.
  48. Pletscher, D.H. and Schwartz, M.K., 2000. The tyranny of population growth. Conservation Biology, 14(6), pp.1918–1919.
  49. Price, S.A. and Gittleman, J.L., 2007. Hunting to extinction: biology and regional economy influence extinction risk and the impact of hunting in artiodactyls. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1620), pp.1845–51.
  50. Rindfuss, R.R., Bumpass, L. and St John, C., 1980. Education and fertility: implications for the roles women occupy. American Sociological Review, 45(3), pp.431–47.
  51. Rödder, D. et al., 2009. Global amphibian extinction risk assessment for the panzootic chytrid fungus. Diversity, 1(1), pp.52–66.
  52. Ross, J. and Bulatao, R., 2001. Contraceptive projections and the donor gap (meeting the challenge series), Rosslyn, VA: John Snow, Inc.
  53. Convention on Biological Diversity Secretariat, 2013. Convention on biological diversity, United Nations.
  54. Sieving, K. et al., 1994. The population crisis demands a focused agenda. Conservation Biology, 8, pp.305–307.
  55. Srikanthan, A. and Reid, R.L., 2008. Religious and cultural influences on contraception. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 30(2), pp.129–137.
  56. Stallings, C.D., 2009. Fishery-independent data reveal negative effect of human population density on Caribbean predatory fish communities. PloS one, 4(5), p.e5333.
  57. Steffen, W. et al., 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, p.1259855.
  58. Steffen, W., Crutzen, J. and McNeill, J.R., 2007. The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of Nature? Ambio, 36(8), pp.614–21.
  59. Singh, S. and Darroch, J.E., 2012. Adding it up: costs and benefits of contraceptive services estimates for 2012, New York: Guttmacher Institute and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).
  60. Thompson, K. and Jones, A., 1999. Human population density and prediction of local plant extinction in britain human population extinction in density britain and prediction of local. Conservation Biology, 13(1), pp.185–189.
  61. Tilman, D. et al., 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371, pp.65–66.
  62. United Nations, 2004. Levels and trends in contraceptive use: 2003 revision, New York: United Nations Publications.
  63. United Nations, 2008. The millennium development goals report 2008, New York: United Nations Publications.
  64. Wire, T., 2009. Fewer emitters, lower emissions, less cost: reducing future carbon emissions by investing in family planning. Masters thesis, London School of Economics.
  65. Wittemyer, G. et al., 2008. Accelerated human population growth at protected area edge. Science, 321(5885), pp.123–6.
  66. WWF, 2014. Living planet report 2014. Gland: WWF.