Published 2018-12-01
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 Herman Daly
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
There are two interacting types of argument for a steady-state economy: its biopyhsical necessity, and its ethical desirability. The first argument is made in terms of the finitude, entropy, and physical maintenance requirements of “dissipative structures” (populations of human bodies and their exosomatic extensions). The second argument considers that the evolution of the human species is now purpose-driven, no longer random, if indeed it ever was. Purpose introduces value judgments of right and wrong regarding how our economy should relate to the rest of creation – judgments ignored by both neoclassical economics and neo-Darwinist naturalism.
Downloads
References
- Carver, T. N., 1924. The economy of human energy, New York: Macmillan.
- Daly, H. 2014, From uneconomic growth to a steady-state economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Daly, H., 2015. Economics for a full world, [online] Available at: <http://www.greattransition.org/publication/economics-for-a-full-world> [Accessed 20 August 2018].
- Georgescu-Roegen, N., 1971. The entropy law and the economic process, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
- Landrigan, P.J. et al., 2017. The Lancet commission on pollution and health [e-journal] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0.