Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020)
Editor Reviewed Articles

Achieving a post-growth green economy

Douglas Booth
Marquette University
This image of the cover of this issue of The Journal of Population and Sustainability has the title in block letters on a grey-green background.

Published 2020-12-01


  • post-materialism,
  • post-growth economy,
  • green economy,
  • population growth,
  • sustainability

How to Cite

Booth, Douglas. 2020. “Achieving a Post-Growth Green Economy”. The Journal of Population and Sustainability 5 (1):57–75. https://doi.org/10.3197/jps.2020.5.1.57.


A transformation in human values in a ‘post-materialist’ direction by middle-class youth around the world may be setting the stage for a new reality of near-zero economic growth and a sustainable and healthy global biosphere. Evidence from the World Values Survey suggests that a global expansion of post-material values and experiences leads to (1) a reduction in consumption-oriented activities, (2) a shift to more environmentally friendly forms of life that include living at higher, more energy efficient urban densities, and (3) active political support for environmental improvement. Such behavioral shifts provide a foundation for a turn to a slow-growth or even no-growth economy in comparatively affluent countries to the benefit of a healthier global biosphere. To set the stage for a ‘post-growth green economy’ that features climate stability and a substantially reduced ecological footprint, the timing is right for a ‘Green New Deal’ that focuses on de-carbonizing the global economy and has the side-benefit of fostering an economic recovery from the Covid-19 global recession currently underway. The financing of global decarbonization by the world’s wealthiest countries is affordable and could stimulate much needed economic improvements in developing countries by creating within them modern, efficient clean energy systems that can serve as a basis for increased economic prosperity. Such prosperity will in turn accelerate declines in population fertility and result ultimately in reduced global population growth. 


  1. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., and Zucman, G. 2017. Global inequality dynamics: new findings from The World Wealth and Income Database. American Economic Review, 107(5), pp.404-409.
  2. Birch, E. L., 2005. Who lIves downtown? In A. Berube, B. Katz, and R. E. Lang, eds. 2005. Redefining urban and suburban America: evidence from Census 2000. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. pp.29-49.
  3. Birch, E. L., 2009. Downtown in the “new American city”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 626(1), pp.134-153.
  4. Booth, D. E. 1998. The environmental consequences of growth: steady-state economics as an alternative to environmental decline. London: Routledge.
  5. Booth, D. E. 2018a. Postmaterial experience economics. Journal of Human Values, 24(2), pp.1-18.
  6. Booth, D. E. 2018b. Postmaterial experience economics, population, and environmental sustainability. Journal of Population and Sustainability, 2(2), pp.33-50.
  7. Brombach, K., Jessen, J., Siedentop, S., and Zakrzewski, P., 2017. Demographic patterns of reurbanisation and housing in metropolitan regions in the U.S. and Germany. Comparative Population Studies, 42, pp.281-317.
  8. Daly, H., 2018. Envisioning a successful steady-state economy. Journal of Population and Sustainability, 3(1), pp.21-33.
  9. Daly, H. 1991. Steady-state economics 2nd ed. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
  10. Feige, E. L., 2000. Taxation for the 21st century: The automated payment transaction (APT) tax. Economic Policy, 15(31), pp.473-511.
  11. Garrett-Peltier, H., 2017. Green versus brown: comparing the employment impacts of energy efficiency, renewable energy, and fossil fuels using an input-output model. Economic Modelling, 61, pp.439-447.
  12. Green Climate Fund, 2019. Achieving the Paris Agreement: How GCF raises climate ambition and empowers action. [online] Available at: https://www.greenclimate.fund/document/achieving-paris-agreement-how-gcf-raises-climate-ambitionand-empowers-action# [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  13. Global Footprint Network, 2020. Data and methodology: World ecological footprint by land type. [online] Available at: https://www.footprintnetwork.org/resources/data/ [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  14. Green New Deal Group, 2008. A green new deal. [pdf] Available at: https://neweconomics.org/uploads/files/8f737ea195fe56db2f_xbm6ihwb1.pdf [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  15. Heal, G., 2017. What would It take to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), pp.319-335.
  16. Jackson, T., 2017. Prosperity without growth: foundations for the economy of tomorrow 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
  17. Markusen, A., 2006. Urban development and the politics of a creative class: evidence from a study of artists. Environment and Planning, 38, pp.1921-1940.
  18. Markusen, A., and Gadwa, A., 2010. Arts and culture in urban or regional planning: a review and research agenda. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(3), pp.379-391.
  19. Markusen, A., and Schrock, G., 2006. The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialisation and economic development implications. Urban Studies, 43(10), pp.1661-1686.
  20. New York City, 2007. Inventory of New York City greenhouse gas emissions. [pdf] Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/planyc/downloads/pdf/publications/greenhousegas_2007.pdf [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  21. Newman, P., and Kenworthy, J. R. 1999. Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependency. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
  22. Newman, P., and Kenworthy, J. R., 2015. The end of automobile dependence: how cities are moving beyond car-based planning. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
  23. Norris, P., and Inglehart, R., 2019. Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. OECD, 2019a. Hours worked. [online] Available at: https://data.oecd.org/emp/hours-worked.htm [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  25. OECD, 2019b. Level of GDP per capita and productivity. [online] Available at: https://data.oecd.org/lprdty/gdp-per-hour-worked.htm [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  26. OECD, 2019c. Labour force participation rate. [online] Available at: https://data.oecd.org/emp/labour-force-participation-rate.htm [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  27. Polzin, S. E., Chu, X., and Godrey, J., 2014. The impact of Millennials’ travel behavior on future personal vehicle travel. Energy Strategy Reviews, 5, pp.59-65.
  28. Sachs, J., 2008. Common wealth: economics for a crowded planet. New York: Penguin Press.
  29. Sachs, J., 2019. Getting to a carbon-free economy. [online] Available at: https://prospect.org/greennewdeal/getting-to-a-carbon-free-economy/ [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  30. Saez, E., 2009. Striking it richer: the evolution of top incomes in the United States (update with 2007 estimates). UC Berkeley: Institute for Research on Labor and Employment. [online] Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8dp1f91x [Accessed November 4, 2020].
  31. Stiglitz, J. E., 2010. Freefall: America, free markets, and the sinking of the world economy. New York: W.W. Norton.
  32. Storm, S., 2017. The new normal: demand, secular stagnation, and the vanishing middle class. International Journal of Political Economy, 46(4), pp.169-210.
  33. U.S. House of Representatives, 116th Congress, 2019. House Resolution 109. Recognizing the duty of the federal government to create a green new deal. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  34. Victor, P. A., 2008. Managing without growth: slower by design, not disaster. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  35. Wei, M., Patadia, S., and Kammen, D. M., 2010. Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work: how many jobs can the clean energy industry generate in the U.S.? Energy Policy, 38, pp.919-931.
  36. Wisman, J. D., 2013. Wage Stagnation, rising inequality and the Financial Crisis of 2008. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(4), pp.921-945.
  37. World Bank, 2019a. CO2 emissions (kt). [online] Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.KT?end=2014&start=1960&view=chart [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  38. World Bank, 2019b. Fertility rate, total (births per woman). [online] Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN/ [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  39. World Bank, 2019c. GDP per capita (constant 2010 US$). [online] Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  40. World Bank, 2019d. Population growth (annual %). [online] Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.GROW?end=2011&start=1961 [Accessed 27 October 2020].
  41. World Bank, 2019e. Population, total. [online] Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.pop.totl [Accessed 27 October 2020].