Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021)
Peer Reviewed Articles

Nudging interventions on sustainable food consumption: a systematic review

PDF HTML
  • Becky Blackford
Becky Blackford
Bournemouth University
Text-only image of the cover of this issue, grey green background.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/jps.2021.5.2.17

Published 2021-08-01

Keywords

  • Nudging Interventions,
  • Sustainable Food Choice,
  • Food Security

How to Cite

Blackford, Becky. 2021. “Nudging Interventions on Sustainable Food Consumption: A Systematic Review”. The Journal of Population and Sustainability 5 (2):17–62. https://doi.org/10.3197/jps.2021.5.2.17.

Copyright (c) 2021 Becky Blackford

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

As population growth continues, sustainable food behaviour is essential to help reduce the anthropogenic modification of natural systems, driven by food production and consumption, resulting in environmental and health burdens and impacts. Nudging, a behavioural concept, has potential implications for tackling these issues, encouraging change in individuals’ intentions and decision-making via indirect proposition and reinforcement; however, lack of empirical evidence for effectiveness and the controversial framework for ethical analysis create challenges. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of nudging interventions on sustainable food choices, searching five databases to identify the effectiveness of such interventions. Of the 742 identified articles, 14 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Overall, the potential of certain nudging interventions for encouraging sustainable food choices were found in strategies that targeted ‘system 1’ thinking (automatic, intuitive and non-conscious, relying on heuristics, mental shortcuts and biases), producing outcomes which were more statistically significant compared to interventions requiring consumer deliberation. Gender, sensory influences, and attractiveness of target dishes were highlighted as pivotal factors in sustainable food choice, hence research that considers these factors in conjunction with nudging interventions is required.

PDF HTML

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Allcott, H. and Mullainathan, S., 2010. Behaviour and energy conservation. Science, 327(5970), pp.1204–1205.
  2. Alsaffar, A., 2016. Sustainable diets: the interaction between food industry, nutrition, health and the environment. Food Science And Technology International, 22, pp.102–111.
  3. Andersen, B. and Hyldif, G., 2015. Consumers’ view on determinants to food satisfaction. A qualitative approach. Appetite, 95, pp.9–16.
  4. Ariely, D. and Loewenstein, G., 2006. The heat of the moment: the effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, pp.87–98.
  5. Arno, A. and Thomas, S., 2016. The efficacy of nudge theory strategies in influencing adult dietary behavior: asystematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 16, pp.676–687.
  6. Beattie, G. and McGuire, L., 2016. Consumption and climate change: Why we say one thing but do another in the face of our greatest threat. Semiotica, 213, pp.493–538.
  7. Becchetti, L., Salustri, F. and Scaramozzino, P., 2020. Nudging and corporate environmental responsibility: a natural field experiment. Food Policy, 97 https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101951
  8. Benton, T., 2016. What will we eat in 2030? World Economic Forum. [Online] Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/what-will-we-eat-in-2030/ [Accessed 25 August 2020].
  9. Bianchi, F. et al., 2018. Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 15(102), pp.1–25.
  10. Bianchi, F. et al., 2018. Restructuring physical microenvironments to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review and qualitative comparative analysis. Lancet Planet Health, 2, pp.384–397.
  11. BIT, 2010. MINDSPACE Influencing behaviour through public policy, London: Cabinet Office.
  12. Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. and Burroughs, H., 2012. Seeking better health care outcomes: the ethics of using the “nudge”. The American Journal of Bioethics, 12(2), pp.1–10.
  13. Bolos, L. A., Lagerkvist, C. J. and Nayga Jr, R. M., 2019. Consumer choice and food waste: can nudging help?. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 34(1), pp.1–8.
  14. Bray, J., Johns, N. and Kilburn, D., 2011. An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. J. Business Ethics, 98, pp.597–608.
  15. Broers, V.J., De Breucker, C., Van den Broucke, S. and Luminet, O., 2017. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of nudging to increase fruit and vegetable choice. European Journal of Public Health, 27(5), pp.912–920.
  16. Bucher, T. et al., 2016. Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice. British Journal of Nutrition, 115, pp.2252–2263.
  17. Campbell-Arvai, V., Arvai, J. and Kalof, L., 2014. Motivating sustainable food choices: the role of nudges, value orientation, and information provision. Environment and Behavior, 46(4), pp.453–475.
  18. Campos, S., Doxey, J. and Hammond, D., 2011. Nutrition labels on. Public Health Nutr, 14, pp.1496–1506.
  19. Carfona, V., Catellani, P., Caso, D. and Conner, M., 2019. How to reduce red processed meat consumption by daily text messages regarding environment or health benefits. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101319
  20. Carroll, R. and Vallen, B., 2014. Compromise and attraction effects in food. Int. J. Consumer Stud, 38, pp.636–641.
  21. CEE, 2020. Aims and Scope. [Online] Available at: http://www.environmentalevidence.org/guidelines/aims-and-scope [Accessed 26 August 2020].
  22. Chance, Z., Gorlin, M. and Dhar, R., 2014. Why choosing healthy foods is hard, and how to help: presenting the 4Ps framework for behavior change. Cust. Need. and Solut, 1, pp.253–262.
  23. Collins, E. et al., 2019. Two observational studies examining the effect of a social norm and a health message on the purchase of vegetables in student canteen settings. Appetite, 132, pp.122–130.
  24. Coucke, N., Vermeir, I., Slabbinck, H. and Van Kerckhove, A., 2019. Show me more! The influence of visibility on sustainable food choices. Foods, 8(186), pp.1–12.
  25. Davis, K. F. et al., 2016. Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources. Global Environmental Chang,. 3, pp.125–132.
  26. de Boer, J., Boersema, J. J. and Aiking, H., 2009. Consumers’ motivational associations favouring freee-range meat or less meat. Ecol. Econ, 68, pp.850–860.
  27. de Grave, R. et al., 2020. A catalogue of UK household datasets to monitor transitions to sustainable diets. Global Food Security, 24, p.100344.
  28. Demarque, C., Charalambides, L., Hilton, D. and Waroquier, L., 2015. Nudging sustainable consumption: The use of descriptive norms to promote a minority behavior in a realistic online shopping environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, pp.166–174.
  29. Downs, J. S., Loewenstein, G. and Wisdom, J., 2009. Strategies for promoting healthier food choices. American Economic Review, 99, pp.159–164.
  30. Doyle, J., O’Connor, D., Reynolds, G. and Bottomley, P., 1999. The robustness of the asymmetrically dominated effect: Buying frames, phantom alternatives, and in-store purchases. Psychol. Mark, 16, pp.225–243.
  31. ElHaffar, G., Durifa, F. and Dubé, L., 2020. Towards closing the attitude-intentionbehavior gap in green consumption: a narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122556
  32. Ethical Consumer, 2018. Ethical consumer market report. Manchester: Ethical Consumer.
  33. FAO, 2019. Sustainable healthy diets guiding principles. Rome: WHO.
  34. FAO, et al., 2020. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020. Transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets. Rome: FAO.
  35. Feldman, C. et al., 2011. Menu engineering: a strategy for seniors to select healthier meals. Perspectives in Public Health, 131(6), pp.267–274.
  36. Ferrari, L., Cavaliere, A., De Marchi, E. and Banterle, A., 2019. Can nudging improve the environmental impact of food supply chain? A systematic review. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 91, pp.184–192.
  37. Fischer, J. et al., 2012. Human behaviour and sustainability. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(3), pp.153–160.
  38. Garnett, E. E. et al., 2019. Impact of increasing vegetarian availability on meal selection and sales in cafeterias. PNAS, 116(42), p.20923–20929.
  39. Gravert, C. and Kurz, V., 2019. Nudging à la carte: a field experiment on climate-friendly food choice. Behavioural Public Policy, 5(3) pp.378–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2019.11
  40. Haddaway, N., Macura, B., Whaley, P. and Pullin, A., 2017. ROSES Flow diagram for systematic reviews, Version 1.0. https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5897389.v3.
  41. Hainmueller, J., Hiscox, M. and Sequeira, S., 2015. Consumer demand for fair trade: evidence from a multistore field experiment. Rev. Econ, 97(2), pp.42–256.
  42. Hansen, P. G., 2016. What is nudging? Behavioral Science and Policy Association. [Online] Available at: https://behavioralpolicy.org/what-is-nudging/ [Accessed 4 September 2020].
  43. Hartmann, C. and Siegrist, M., 2017. Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: a systematic review. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 61, pp.11–25.
  44. Hedin, B., Katzeff, C., Eriksson, E. and Pargman, D., 2019. A systematic review of digital behaviour change interventions for more sustainable food consumption. Sustainability, 11(9), pp.1–23.
  45. Helmefalk, M. and Berndt, A., 2018. Shedding light on the use of single and multisensory cues and their effect on consumer behaviours. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag, 46, pp.1077–1091.
  46. Henderson, S., Nink, E., Nierenberg, D. and Oakley, E., 2015. The real cost of food: examining the social, environmental and health impacts of producing food. Baltimore: Food Tank.
  47. Hollands, G. et al., 2017. The TIPPME intervention typology for changing environments to change behaviour. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(0140), pp.1-14.
  48. Holloway, T., Salter, A. and McCullough, F., 2012. Dietary intervention to reduce meat intake by 50% in university students – a pilot study. Proc. Nutr. Soc, 71, p.164.
  49. Just, D. R. and Wansink, B., 2009. Smarter lunchrooms: using behavioral economics to improve meal selection. Choices, 24(3), pp.1–7.
  50. Kácha, O. and Ruggeri, K., 2019. Nudging intrinsic motivation in environmental risk and social policy. Journal of Risk Research, 22(5), pp.581–592.
  51. Kahneman, D., 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  52. Kaljonen, M., Salo, M., Lyytimaki, J. and Furman, E., 2020. From isolated labels and nudges to sustained tinkering: assessing long-term changes in sustainable eating at a lunch restaurant. British Food Journal, 122(11), pp.1–17.
  53. Kasperbauer, T., 2017. The permissibility of nudging for sustainable energy consumption. Energy Policy, 111, pp.52–57.
  54. Kearney, J., 2010. Food consumption trends and drivers. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B, 365, pp.2793–2807.
  55. Kerr, J. and Foster, L., 2011. Sustainable consumption – UK Government activity. Nutrition Bulletin, 36, pp.422–425.
  56. Ketelsen, M., Janssen, M. and Hamm, U., 2020. Consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging -a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, pp.120–123.
  57. Kraak, V., Englund, T., Misyak, S. and Serrano, E., 2017. A novel marketing mix and choice architecture framework to nudge restaurant customers toward healthy food environments to reduce obesity in the United States. Obesity Reviews, 18, pp.852–868.
  58. Kurz, V., 2018. Nudging to reduce meat consumption: immediate and persistent effects of an intervention at a university restaurant. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 90, pp.317–341.
  59. Lassalette et al., 2014. Food and feed trade as a driver in the global nitrogen cycle: 50-year trends. Biogeochemistry, 118, pp.225–241.
  60. Lea, E., Crawford, D. and Worsley, A., 2006. Public views of the benefits and the barriers to the consumption of a plant-based diet. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 60, pp.828–837.
  61. Lehner, M., Mont, O. and Heiskanen, E., 2016. Nudging – a promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134(A), pp.166–177.
  62. Liu, J., Thomas, J. and Higgs, S., 2019. The relationship between social identity, descriptive social norms and eating intentions and behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, pp.217–230.
  63. Löfgren, Å., Martinsson, P., Hennlock, M. and Sterner, T., 2012. Are experienced people affected by a pre-set default option – results from a field experiment. Journal of Environmental Economics, 63(1), pp.66–72
  64. Lombardini, C. and Lankoski, L., 2013. Forced choice restriction in promoting sustainable food consumption: Intended and unintended effects of the mandatory vegetarian day inHelsinki schools. J. Consum. Policy, 36, pp.159–178.
  65. Loschelder, D. D., Siepelmeyer, H., Fischer, D. and Rubele, J. A., 2019. Dynamic norms drive sustainable consumption: Norm-based nudging helps café customers to avoid disposable to-go-cups. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75(A). https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.02.002
  66. Marteau, T., 2017. Towards environmentally sustainable human behaviour: targeting non-conscious and conscious processes for effective and acceptable policies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc A, 375. https://www.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0371
  67. Masicampo, E. and Baumeister, R., 2008. Toward a physiology of dual−process reasoning and judgment: lemonade, willpower, and expensive rule−based analysis. Psychol. Sci, 19, pp.255–260.
  68. McBey, D., Watts, D. and Johnstone, A. M., 2019. Nudging, formulating new products, and the lifecourse: a qualitative assessment of the viability of three methods for reducing Scottish meat consumption for health, ethical, and environmental reasons. Appetite, 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104349
  69. McDaniel, J. H., Hunt, A., Hackes, B. and Pope, J. F., 2001. Impact of dining room environment on nutritional intake of Alzheimer’s residents: a case study. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 16(5), pp.297–302.
  70. McDonald, R. I., Fielding, K. S. and Louis, W. R., 2014. Conflicting norms highlight the need for action. Environment and Behavior, 46, pp.139–162.
  71. Morizet, D. et al., 2012. Effect of labeling on new vegetable dish. Appetite, 59, pp.399–402.
  72. Nørnberg, T. R., Houlby, L., Skov, L. R. and Peréz-Cueto, F. J. A., 2015. Choice architecture interventions for increased vegetable intake and behaviour change in a school setting: a systematic review. Perspectives in Public Health, 136(3), pp.132–142.
  73. Notarnicola et al., 2017. Environmental impacts of food consumption in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp.753–765.
  74. Ohlhausen, P. and Langen, N., 2020. When a combination of nudges decreases sustainable food choices out of home – the example of food decoys and descriptive name labels. Foods, 9(557), pp.1–18.
  75. Perici´c-Poklepovi´c, T. and Tanveer, S., 2019. Why systematic reviews matter, [online] Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/authors-update/why-systematicreviews-matter [Accessed 26 August 2020].
  76. Piester, H. E. et al., 2020. “I’ll try the veggie burger”: increasing purchases of sustainable foods with information about sustainability and taste. Appetite, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104842
  77. Ratner, R. K. et al., 2008. How behavioral decision research can enhance consumer welfare: From freedom of choice to paternalistic intervention. Marketing Letters, 19, pp.383–397.
  78. Rausch, T. and Kopplin, C., 2021. Bridge the gap: consumers’ purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123882
  79. Ritchie, H. and Roser, M., 2020. Environmental impacts of food production, [online] Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-offood[Accessed 25 August 2020].
  80. Salmivaara, L. and Lankoski, L., 2019. Promoting sustainable consumer behaviour through the activation of injunctive social norms: a field experiment in 19 workplace restaurants. Organization and Environment, https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1086026619831651
  81. Scarborough, P.E.A., 2014. Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK. Climate Change, 125, pp.179–192.
  82. Schanes, K., Dobernig, K. and Goezet, B., 2018. Food waste matters -a systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 182, pp.978–991.
  83. Schoesler, H., de Boer, J. and Boersema, J., 2014. Fostering more sustainable food choices: can Self-Determination Theory help?. Food Quality And Preference, 35, pp. 9–69.
  84. SCORAI, 2018. Third international conference of the sustainable consumption research and action initiative, [online] Available at: https://scorai.net/2018conference/ [Accessed 4 September 2020].
  85. Shiv, B. and Fedorikhin, A., 1999. Heart and mind in conflict: the interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, pp.278–292.
  86. Simonson, I., 1989. Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consum, Res, 16, pp.158–174.
  87. Slapø, H. B. and Karevold, K. I., 2019. Simple eco-labels to nudge customers toward the most environmentally friendly warm dishes: an empirical study in a cafeteria setting. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3(40), pp.1–9.
  88. Sunstein, C., 2013. Behavioural Economics, Consumption, and Environmental Protection. In: L. Reisch and J. Thøgersen, eds. 2013. Handbook on research in sustainable consumption. pp.1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2296015
  89. Sustainable Food Trust, 2019. The hidden cost of UK food. Bristol: Sustainable Food Trust.
  90. Taghikhah, F., Voinov, A. and Shukla, N., 2019. Extending the supply chain to address sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, pp.652-666.
  91. Taufika, D., Verain, M., Bouwman, E. and Reinders, M., 2019. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 93, pp.281–303.
  92. Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C., 2008. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. London: Penguin Books.
  93. Thorndike, A. N., Riis, J., Sonnenberg, L. M. and Levy, D. E., 2014. Traffic-light labels and choice architecture: promoting healthy food choices. Am. J. Prevent. Med, 46, pp.143–149.
  94. Tillman, D. and Clark, M., 2014. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature, 515, pp.518-522.
  95. Torma, G., Aschemann-Witzel, J. and Thøgersen, J., 2018. I nudge myself: exploring ‘self-nudging’ strategies to drive sustainable consumption behaviour. Int J Consum Stud, 42, pp.141-154.
  96. UNCED, 1992. Agenda 21: sustainable development knowledge platform. [Online] Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/ Agenda21.pdf [Accessed 4 September 2020].
  97. United Nations, 2020. Sustainable consumption and production: United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, [online] Available at: https://www. un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/ [Accessed 25 August 2020].
  98. Van Doorn, J. and Verhoef, P., 2011. Willingness to pay for organic products: differences between virtue and vice foods. Int. J. Res. Mark, 28(3), pp.167–180.
  99. Van Kleef, E., Otten, K. and Van Trijp, H., 2012. Healthy snacks at the checkout counter: a lab and field study on the impact of shelf arrangement and assortment structure on consumer choices. BMC Public Health, 12. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1072
  100. Vandenbroele, J., Slabbinck, H., Van Kerckhove, A. and Vermeir, I., 2018. Curbing portion size effects by adding smaller portions at the point of purchase. Food Quality and Preference, 64, pp.82–87.
  101. Vandenbroele, J. et al., 2019. Nudging to get our food choices on a sustainable track. Proceedings of The Nutrition Society, 79(1), pp.1–14.
  102. Vecchio, R. and Cavallo, C., 2019. Increasing healthy food choices through nudges: a systematic review. Food Quality and Preference, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.014
  103. Vermeer, W. M., Steenhuis, I. H. and Seidell, J. C., 2010. Portion size: a qualitative study of consumers’ attitudes toward point-of-purchase interventions aimed at portion size. Health Education Research, 25, pp.109–120.
  104. Viegas,C.andLins,A., 2019.Changing thefood forthefuture:food andsustainability. European Journal Of Tourism Hospitality And Recreation, 9(2), pp.52–57.
  105. Wansink, B., 2015. Change their choice! changing behavior using the CAN approach and activism research. Psychology and Marketing, 32(5), pp.486–500.
  106. White, K., Habib, R. and Hardisty, D., 2019. How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 8(3), pp.22–49.
  107. Wilson, A., Buckley, E., Buckley, J. and Bogomolova, S., 2016. Nudging healthier food and beverage choices through salience and priming. Evidence from a systematic review. Food Qual. Prefer, 51, pp.47–64.
  108. Worsley, A., Wang, W. C. and Farragher, T., 2016. The associations of vegetable consumption with food mavenism, personal values, food knowledge and demographic factors. Appetite, 97, pp.29–36.
  109. Zakowska-Biemans, S., Pieniak, Z., Kostyra, E. and Gutkowska, K., 2019. Searching for a measure integrating sustainable and healthy eating behaviors. Nutrients, 11(95), pp.1–17.
  110. Zhou, X. et al., 2019. Promotion of novel plant-based dishes among older consumers using the ‘dish of the day’ as a nudging strategy in 4 EU countries. Food Quality and Preference, 75, pp.260–272.