Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Networks of Plants and the Language of Resonance in Science and Literature
Research Articles

Resonance and Vegetal Citizenship in Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac

PDF HTML
  • Hannes Bergthaller
Hannes Bergthaller
National Taiwan Normal University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/whppp.63845494909737

Published 2024-10-17

Keywords

  • anthropomorphism,
  • biotic community,
  • environmental ethics,
  • land ethic,
  • resonance

How to Cite

Bergthaller, Hannes. 2024. “Resonance and Vegetal Citizenship in Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac”. Plant Perspectives 1 (2):335-53. https://doi.org/10.3197/whppp.63845494909737.

Copyright (c) 2024 Hannes Bergthaller

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The problem of ethical obligations to plants has rarely been raised in Western traditions of thought. However, it is central to Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac, one of the key texts of modern American environmentalism. For Leopold, the effects of a civilisation on the vegetal base of the trophic pyramid are the ultimate measure of its value, and the principal failure of modern civilisation is that it blinds people to this fact. For humans to become proper citizens of the land community, they must build reciprocal relationships with other members of the community, which can be understood as relationships of resonance (H. Rosa). Crucially, this also includes plants, who are thus recognised as vegetal citizens. Leopold’s descriptions of his own relationships to the native flora, built over the course of a decade of ecological restoration work on his property in Sauk County, Wisconsin, must be viewed in this context.

PDF HTML

References

  1. Barnett, Joshua Trey. 2022. Mourning in the Anthropocene. Ecological Grief and Earthly Coexistence. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. https://doi.org/10.14321/j.ctv2npq91p
  2. Bergthaller, Hannes. Populäre Ökologie. Zur Literatur und Geschichte der modernen Umweltbewegung in den USA. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang, 2007.
  3. Callicott, J. Baird. 1989. ‘Hume’s is/ought dichotomy and the relation of ecology to Leopold’s Land Ethic’. In J. Baird Callicott (ed.) In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy, pp. 117–27. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  4. Callicott, J. Baird. 2001. ‘The Land Ethic’. In Dale Jamieson (ed.) A Companion to Environmental Philosophy, pp. 204–17. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470751664.ch14
  5. Cannavò, Peter F. 2012. ‘Ecological citizenship, time, and corruption: Aldo Leopold’s Green Republicanism’. Environmental Politics 21 (6): 864–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.683148
  6. Fleming, William and William Forbes. 2006. ‘Following in Leopold’s footsteps: Revisiting and restoring the Rio Gavilan watershed’. Ecological Restoration 24 (1): 25–31. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.24.1.25
  7. Kallhoff, Angela. 2014. ‘Plants in Ethics: Why flourishing deserves moral respect’. Environmental Values 23: 685–700. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327114X13947900181518
  8. Leopold, Aldo. 1966 [1949]. A Sand County Almanac, with Essays on Conservation from Round River. New York: Ballantine Books.
  9. Marder, Michael. 2012. ‘The life of plants and the limits of empathy’. Dialogue 51: 259–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217312000431
  10. Meine, Curt. 1988. Aldo Leopold: His Life and Work. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  11. Pellegrino, Gianfranco. 2018. ‘The value of plants: On the axiologies of plants’. In Angela Kallhoff, Marcello Di Paola and Maria Schoergenhumer (eds). Plant Ethics: Concepts and Applications, pp. 13–29. London: Routledge.
  12. Peters, Mathijs and Bareez Majid. 2022. Exploring Hartmut Rosa’s Concept of Resonance. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18060-6
  13. Ripple, William J. and Robert L. Beschta. 2005. ‘Linking wolves and plants: Aldo Leopold on trophic cascades’. BioScience 55 (1): 613–21. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0613:LWAPAL]2.0.CO;2
  14. Rosa, Hartmut. 2019. Resonanz: Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
  15. Sandilands, Catriona. 2021. ‘Plant/s matter’. Women’s Studies 50 (8): 776–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2021.1983433
  16. Schörgenhumer, Maria. 2018. ‘Caring for plants: Cultivating relational values’. In Angela Kallhoff, Marcello Di Paola and Maria Schoergenhumer (eds). Plant Ethics: Concepts and Applications, pp. 110–18. London: Routledge.
  17. Sloterdijk, Peter. 2011. Spheres I: Microspherology. Translated by Wieland Hoban. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  18. Twain, Mark. 1910. Mark Twain’s Speeches. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  19. Wandersee, James H. and Elisabeth E. Schussler. 2001. ‘Toward a theory of plant blindness’. Plant Science Bulletin 47: 2–9.