Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Networks of Plants and the Language of Resonance in Science and Literature
Research Articles

Interspecies Entanglements: Plant History and Racial Theory in Georg Forster’s Essay Vom Brodbaum (On The Breadtree, 1784)

Nick Enright
University of Sydney

Published 2024-10-17

Keywords

  • breadfruit,
  • colonial botany,
  • race,
  • Pacific,
  • Georg Forster

How to Cite

Enright, Nick. 2024. “Interspecies Entanglements: Plant History and Racial Theory in Georg Forster’s Essay Vom Brodbaum (On The Breadtree, 1784)”. Plant Perspectives 1 (2):313-34. https://doi.org/10.3197/whppp.63845494909736.

Abstract

This article focuses on the strained legacy of colonial botany and plant trafficking in the context of European expansion and colonisation. ‘Interspecies entanglements’ refers to the relationships of power, knowledge, accumulation, commodification and desire that are perceptible when humans talk about plants in the framework of colonialism. The example I take is the breadfruit tree (Artocarpus altilis), a member of the mulberry family dispersed widely across the Pacific, which was famously transplanted from Tahiti to the Caribbean in the 1790s. After elaborating its journey through cultural discourse (first as ‘bread of the Gods’, then as ‘food for slaves’), I focus on German naturalist Georg Forster’s essay, titled Vom Brodbaum (On the Breadtree, 1784). My underlying contention is that, while Forster redresses some damning stereotypes and misconceptions relating to the Pacific cultures, his interest in race and the attendant hierarchies places a question mark over the integrity of his scientific engagement with human and plant knowledge alike.

References

  1. Arnold, David. 2000. ‘“Illusory riches”: Representations of the tropical world, 1840–1950’. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 21 (1): 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9493.00060
  2. Banks, Joseph. 1962. The Endeavour Journal of Joseph Banks, ed. by J.C. Beaglehole. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
  3. Bewell, Alan. 2007. ‘Traveling Natures’. Nineteenth-Century Contexts 29 (2–3): 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905490701584486
  4. Bindman, David. 2002. Ape to Apollo. Aesthetics and the Idea of Race in the 18th Century. London: Reaktion Books.
  5. Bougainville, Louis-Antoine de. 1771. Voyage autour du monde par la frégate du Roi La Boudeuse et la flûte L’Étoile; en 1766, 1767, 1768 & 1769. Paris: Saillant & Nyon. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.62716
  6. Brockway, L.H. 1979. ‘Science and colonial expansion: The role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens’. American Ethnologist 6 (3): 449–65. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1979.6.3.02a00030
  7. Casid, Jill H. 2004. Sowing Empire. Landscape and Colonization. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
  8. Clayton, Daniel and Gavin Bowd. 2006. ‘Geography, tropicality and postcolonialism: Anglophone and Francophone readings of the work of Pierre Gourou’. L’Espace géographique 35 (3): 208–21. https://doi.org/10.3917/eg.353.0208
  9. Cook, James. 1773. ‘An Account of a Voyage round the World, in the years MDCCLXVIII, MDCCLXIX, MDCCLXX, and MDCCLXXI by Lieutenant James Cook’. In An Account of the Voyages … for making Discoveries in the Southern Hemisphere, ed. by John Hawkesworth. London.
  10. Cook, James. 1968. The Voyage of the ‘Endeavour’ 1768–1771, ed. J.C. Beaglehole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Cooper, Frederick. 2005. Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520938618
  12. Crosby, Alfred W. 1986. Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Crosby, Alfred W. 2003. The Columbian Exchange. Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492. Westport, Conn.; London: Praeger.
  14. Crozet, Julien. 1891. Crozet’s Voyage to Tasmania, New Zealand, the Ladrone Islands, and the Philippines in the Years 1771–1772. Trans. from the French by H.L. Roth. London: Truslove & Shirley.
  15. Despoix, Philippe. 2009. Die Welt vermessen. Dispositive der Entdeckungsreise im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. Trans. by Guido Goerlitz. Göttingen: Wallstein.
  16. Douglas, Bronwen. 2008. ‘“Novus Orbis Australis”: Oceania in the science of race, 1750–1850’. In Bronwen Douglas and Chris Ballard (eds). Foreign Bodies: Oceania and the Science of Race 1750–1940. ANU E Press. pp. 99–156. https://doi.org/10.22459/FB.11.2008.03
  17. Drayton, Richard. 2000. Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain, and the ‘Improvement’ of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  18. Ellis, John. 1775. A Description of the Mangostan, and the Bread-Fruit, the first one of the most delicious, the other, the most useful of all the Fruits in the East Indies … London. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.152706
  19. Enright, Nick. 2022. Plant and Settle. Eighteenth-Century Fictions of European Colonisation (Defoe, Saint-Pierre, Kleist). Ph.D. diss., University of Sydney.
  20. Forster, Georg. 1958. ‘Reise um die Welt’. In Gerhard Steiner (ed.) Werke Vol. 1. Leipzig: Insel Verlag.
  21. Forster, Georg. 1784. Vom Brodbaum. Kassel: Hofbuchdruckerey.
  22. Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York & London: Routledge.
  23. Grove. Richard H. 1996. Green Imperialism. Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Hallam, Sylvia. 1975. Fire and Hearth: A Study of Aboriginal Usage and European Usurpation in South-Western Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
  25. Harding, Sandra. 2008. Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381181
  26. Humboldt, Alexander von. 1847. Kosmos: Entwurf einer physischen Weltbeschreibung. Vol. 2. Stuttgart/Tübingen.
  27. Kay, Charles and Randy Simmons. 2002. Wilderness and Political Ecology: Aboriginal Influences and the Original State of Nature. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  28. Kleingeld, Pauline. 2013. Kant and Cosmopolitanism. The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  29. Küchler-Williams, Christiane. 2004. Erotische Paradiese. Zur europäischen Südseerezeption im 18. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Wallstein.
  30. Mackay, David. 1985. In the Wake of Cook: Exploration, Science and Empire, 1780–1801. London: Croom Helm.
  31. Mastnak, Tomaz, Julia Elyachar and Tom Boellstorff. 2014. ‘Botanical decolonization: rethinking native plants’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32: 363–80. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13006p
  32. May, Yomb. 2008. ‘Kultur im Zeichen des Geschlechts: Eine genderorientierte und postkoloniale Lektüre von Georg Forsters Reise um die Welt’. Forster-Studien XIII. Kassel: Kassel University Press. pp. 175–200.
  33. Mignolo, Walter D. 2003. The Darker Side of the Renaissance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8739
  34. National Tropical Botanical Garden. n.d. ‘Breadfruit Species’: https://ntbg.org/breadfruit/about-breadfruit/species (accessed 19 September 2023.)
  35. Newell, Jennifer. 2010. Trading Nature: Tahitians, Europeans, and Ecological Exchange. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824832810.001.0001
  36. Orr, Bridget. 1994. ‘“Southern passions mix with Northern art”: Miscegenation and the Endeavour voyage’. Eighteenth-Century Life 18 (3): 212–31.
  37. Philip, Kavita. 2004. Civilizing Natures: Race, Resources, and Modernity in Colonial South India. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  38. Pratt, Mary Louise. 1992. Imperial Eyes. Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge.
  39. Rachwal, Tadeusz. 1999. ‘The employment of the word. Writing, topography, and colonial landscapes’. In David E. Nye (ed.) Technologies of Landscape. From Reaping to Recycling. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. pp. 87–96.
  40. Sandilands, Catriona. 2016. ‘Floral sensations: Plant biopolitics’. In Teena Gabrielson et al. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 226–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685271.013.33
  41. Schiebinger, Londa L. 2004. Plants and Empire. Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  42. Shiva, Vandana. 1997. Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. Boston, MA: South End Press.
  43. Smith, Bernard. 1985. European Vision and the South Pacific. Sydney: Harper Row.
  44. Spary, Emma C. 2000. Utopia’s Garden. French Natural History from Old Regime to Revolution. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226768700.001.0001
  45. Stafford, Barbara Maria. 1984. Voyage into Substance: Art, Science, Nature, and the Illustrated Travel Account, 1760–1840. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252038655.001.0001
  46. Thomas, Nicholas. 1991. Entangled Objects. Exchange, Material Culture and Colonialism in the Pacific. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  47. Thunberg, Carl Peter and Joseph Banks. 1779. ‘Sitodium Incisum et Macrocarpon, Ususque Fructuum Qui Exinde Nascuntur, Descripta a Carolo’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 69: 462–84. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1779.0031
  48. Young, Robert C. 1995. Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture, and Race. London: Routledge.
  49. Zhang, Chunjie. 2013. ‘Georg Forster in Tahiti: Enlightenment, sentiment and the intrusion of the South Seas’. Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 36 (2): 263–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-0208.2012.00545.x