Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Networks of Plants and the Language of Resonance in Science and Literature
Research Articles

On Being Called by Plants: Phytopoetics and the Phytosphere

PDF HTML
  • John C. Ryan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/whppp.63845494909733

Published 2024-10-17

Keywords

  • botanical sapience,
  • endosphere,
  • phyllosphere,
  • phytosphere,
  • plant poetics,
  • rhizosphere
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Ryan, John C. 2024. “On Being Called by Plants: Phytopoetics and the Phytosphere”. Plant Perspectives 1 (2):258-75. https://doi.org/10.3197/whppp.63845494909733.

Copyright (c) 2024 John C. Ryan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This article brings the emerging ecohumanistic idea of ‘phytopoetics’ into dialogue with the established scientific concept of the ‘phytosphere’ to understand poetry concerning human-flora interdependencies. Developing a phytospheric framework, I analyse poetry of the root-soil interface (rhizosphere), leaves (phyllosphere) and plants’ interior domain (endosphere). Countering a view of flora as passive, phytospherically contoured poetry foregrounds the agencies of plants within their multifaceted spheres of relation. I ground the article’s theoretical assertions in an examination of the rhizospheric poetics of Louise Glück and Brenda Hillman; phyllosperic poetics of Ted Hughes and Kathy Jetn̄il-Kijiner; and endospheric poetics of Michael McClure and the Microcosms project. In addition to its ecological function, the phytosphere is a nexus of language propagation and catalyst of identification with vegetal life. Shaped by phytospheric delineations, contemporary phytopoems particularise plants, liberating vegetal life from the backdrop of consciousness and enabling the human to be called by plants in their own voices.

PDF HTML

References

  1. Blankenship, Robert E. 2010. ‘Early evolution of photosynthesis’. Plant Physiology 154 (2) (2010): 434–38. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.161687
  2. Bryant, William Cullen. 2006 [1829]. ‘To the Fringed Gentian’. In William Cullen Bryant: An American Voice, ed. by Frank Gado. Hartford, VT: Antoca Press. p. 73.
  3. Compant, Stéphane, Marine C. Cambon, Corinne Vacher, Birgit Mitter, Abdul Samad and Angela Sessitsch. 2021. ‘The plant endosphere world: Bacterial life within plants’. Environmental Microbiology 23 (4): 1812–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15240
  4. Costello, Moya. 2021. Pressed Specimens: Prose Poems from the Southern Cross Plant Science Herbarium. Tipperary, Ireland: Beir Bua Press.
  5. Darwin, Charles and Francis Darwin. 2018 [1880]. The Works of Charles Darwin: The Power of Movement in Plants, ed. by Paul Barrett and R.B. Freeman. London: Routledge.
  6. Gagliano, Monica, John C. Ryan and Patrícia Vieira (eds). 2017. The Language of Plants: Science, Philosophy, Literature. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  7. Glazier, Loss Pequeño. 2022. Transparent Mountain: Ecopoetry from the Great Smokies. San Francisco: Night Horn Books.
  8. Glück, Louise. 1992. The Wild Iris. New York: Ecco.
  9. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. 2009 [1790]. The Metamorphosis of Plants. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  10. Gross, Michael. 2016. ‘Could plants have cognitive abilities?’ Current Biology 26 (5): R181–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.044
  11. Harries-Jones, Peter. 2016. Upside-Down Gods: Gregory Bateson’s World of Difference. New York: Fordham University Press.
  12. Hartmann, Anton, Michael Rothballer and Michael Schmid. 2008. ‘Lorenz Hiltner, a pioneer in rhizosphere microbial ecology and soil bacteriology research’. Plant and Soil 312 (1–2):: 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9514-z
  13. Hillman, Brenda. 2023. ‘To Mycorrhizae Under Our Mother’s Garden’: https://poets.org/poem/mycorrhizae-under-our-mothers-garden (accessed 19 July 2023).
  14. Hiraishi, Kuʻuwehi. 2018. ‘Marshallese women revive traditional weaving’. Hawai’i Public Radio, 5 Dec. 2018: https://www.hawaiipublicradio.org/local-news/2018-12-05/marshallese-women-revive-traditional-weaving (accessed 19 July 2023)
  15. Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 1996. Signs of Meaning in the Universe, ed. by Barbara J. Haveland. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  16. Hughes, Ted. 1973. Selected Poems: 1957–1967. 1st ed. New York: Harper & Row.
  17. Jacobs, Joela. 2019. ‘Phytopoetics: Upending the passive paradigm with vegetal violence and eroticism’. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 5 (2): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i2.30027
  18. Jetn̄il-Kijiner, Kathy. 2017. Iep Jāltok: Poems from a Marshallese Daughter. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  19. Kalderon-Asael, Boriana, Joachim A.R. Katchinoff, Noah J. Planavsky et al. 2021. ‘A lithium-isotope perspective on the evolution of carbon and silicon cycles’. Nature 595 (7867): 394–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03612-1
  20. Karban, Richard. 2017. ‘The language of plant communication (and how it compares to animal communication)’. In Gagliano, Ryan and Vieira (eds). The Language of Plants. pp. 3–26.
  21. Khare, Ekta, Jitendra Mishra and Naveen Kumar Arora. 2018. ‘Multifaceted interactions between endophytes and plant: Developments and prospects’. Frontiers in Microbiology 9 (2732) (2018): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02732
  22. Kimmerer, Robin. 2015. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.
  23. Lahbouki, Soufiane, Raja Ben-Laouane, Mohamed Anli, Abderrahim Boutasknit, Youssef Ait-Rahou, Mohamed Ait-El-Mokhtar, Soumaya el Gabardi et al. 2022. ‘Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and/or organic amendment enhance the tolerance of prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-Indica) under drought stress’. Journal of Arid Environments 199 (104703): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2021.104703
  24. Larcher, Walter. 2003. Physiological Plant Ecology. 4th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  25. Lemanceau, P., M. Barret, S. Mazurier, S. Mondy, B. Pivato, T. Fort and C. Vacher. 2017. ‘Plant communication with associated microbiota in the spermosphere, rhizosphere and phyllosphere’. In G. Becard (ed.) How Plants Communicate With Their Biotic Environment. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 101–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.abr.2016.10.007
  26. Leveau, Johan H.J. 2019. ‘A brief from the leaf: Latest research to inform our understanding of the phyllosphere microbiome’. Current Opinion in Microbiology 49 (June): 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2019.10.002
  27. Lotman, Yuri. 2005. ‘On the semiosphere’. Sign Systems Studies 33 (1): 205–29.
  28. McClure, Michael. 1959. Hymns to St. Geryon and Other Poems. 1st ed. San Francisco: Auerhahn Press.
  29. Merlin, Mark. 2023. ‘Plants by Scientific Names’. Plants and Environments of the Marshall Islands: https://www.hawaii.edu/cpis/MI/Home.html (accessed 19 July 2023).
  30. Murray, Les. 1992. Translations from the Natural World. Paddington, NSW: Isabella Press.
  31. Neidjie, Bill. 1989. Story About Feeling. Broome, WA: Magabala Books.
  32. Oswald, Alice. 2009. Weeds and Wild Flowers: Poems by Alice Oswald, Etchings by Jessica Greenman. London: Faber and Faber.
  33. Pflugheber, Jill and Steven F. White. 2023. Microcosms: A Homage to Sacred Plants of the Americas: https://www.microcosmssacredplants.org (accessed 19 July 2023).
  34. Rho, Hyungmin and Soo-Hyung Kim. 2017. ‘Endophyte effects on photosynthesis and water use of plant hosts: A meta-analysis’. In Sharon Lafferty Doty (ed). Functional Importance of the Plant Microbiome: Implications for Agriculture, Forestry and Bioenergy. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65897-1_4
  35. Ryan, John C. 2018. Plants in Contemporary Poetry: Ecocriticism and the Botanical Imagination. New York: Routledge, 2018.
  36. Ryan, John C. 2020. ‘Wild yam dreaming: The phytopoetics of Emily Kame Kngwarreye’. Plumwood Mountain 7 (1) (2020): https://plumwoodmountain.com/essays-interviews/wild-yam-dreaming-the-phytopoetics-of-emily-kame-kngwarreye/ (accessed 20 July 2023).
  37. Ryan, John C. 2023. ‘Phytopoetics: Human-plant relations and the poiesis of vegetal life’. In Julia Fiedorczuk, Mary Newell, Bernard Quetchenbach and Orchid Tierney (eds). The Routledge Companion to Ecopoetics. New York: Routledge. pp. 117–26.
  38. Saito, Asami, Seishi Ikeda, Hiroshi Ezura and Kiwamu Minamisawa. 2007. ‘Microbial community analysis of the phytosphere using culture-independent methodologies’. Microbes and Environments 22 (2) (2007): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.22.93
  39. Sarkar, Sohini, Abhijit Dey, Vinay Kumar, Gaber El-Saber Batiha, Mohamed A. El-Esawi, Michał Tomczyk and Puja Ray. 2021. ‘Fungal endophyte: An interactive endosymbiont with the capability of modulating host physiology in myriad ways’. Frontiers in Plant Science 12 (701800): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.701800
  40. Segundo‐Ortin, Miguel and Paco Calvo. 2022. ‘Consciousness and cognition in plants’. WIREs Cognitive Science 13 (2) (2022): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1578
  41. Simard, Suzanne. 2018. ‘Mycorrhizal networks facilitate tree communication, learning, and memory’. In František Baluška, Monica Gagliano and Guenther Witzany (eds). Memory and Learning in Plants. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75596-0_10
  42. Svoboda, Josef. 1989. ‘The reality of the phytosphere and (ultimate) values involved’. Ultimate Reality and Meaning 12 (1989): 104–12.
  43. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2021. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  44. van Elsas, Jan Dirk, Sarah Turner and Mark J. Bailey. 2003. ‘Horizontal gene transfer in the phytosphere’. New Phytologist 157 (3): 525–37. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00697.x
  45. van Overbeek, Leonard S. and Kari Saikkonen. 2016. ‘Impact of bacterial-fungal interactions on the colonization of the endosphere’. Trends in Plant Science 21 (3): 230–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.003
  46. Vasco, Alejandra, Robbin C. Moran and Barbara A. Ambrose. 2013. ‘The evolution, morphology, and development of fern leaves’. Frontiers in Plant Science 4 (345): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00345
  47. Vieira, Patrícia. 2017. ‘Phytographia: Literature as plant writing’. In Gagliano, Ryan and Vieira (eds). The Language of Plants. pp. 215–33.
  48. Wampole, Christy. 2016. Rootedness: The Ramifications of a Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  49. Yang, Teng, Yan Chen, Xing-Xiang Wang and Chuan-Chao Dai. 2013. ‘Plant symbionts: Keys to the phytosphere’. Symbiosis 59 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-012-0190-2