Published 2024-04-15
Keywords
- arboreal and botanical knowledge,
- ecocriticism,
- ecofantasy,
- embodiment,
- human maturation process
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2024 Irene Bordignon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This article supports the thesis that (eco)fantasy novels written for young adult people are nowadays crucial to give the next generation an ecological expertise to face environmental challenges. It is therefore important to consider what perceptions of nature are actually conveyed through the reading of these literary works, thus involving a pure dissemination of knowledge about flora. The novel Odin’s Child (Odinsbarn, 2013) by Siri Pettersen is considered here, giving voice to arboreal and botanical perspectives and basing the analysis on phytocriticism and the recent developments in ecocriticism. Odin’s Child supports the belief that a deep knowledge about botanical elements can be shared through the practice of embodiment and through an active interaction with the plant world, especially at a young age; for this reason, the importance of liminality and the role of contemporary literature in the human maturation process are underlined here. Plants play multiple sustainable roles in our life and for the survival of the planet: they are sources of medical treatments, and absorbers of carbon dioxide and other air pollutants (Jones and MacLeod 2022). Yet, it is only recently that scholars from the humanities have started analysing the role of plants in fiction, inaugurating the so-called ‘plant-turn’. The aim of this study is to highlight the importance of plants and botanical knowledge in young people’s understanding of and engagement with the natural world via young adult literature. This article’s approach will underscore the pedagogical value of ecofantasy as a suitable genre in creating empathy and a positive attunement towards flora in young readers. The central part of this paper, informed by the work of John C. Ryan (2018) and his phytocritical method, provides an analysis of the botanical elements of the econovel Odin’s Child, with an emphasis on its affective potential. A final reflection will involve new materialistic visions – such as the concepts of hybridisation (Curry 2013) and transcorporeality (Alaimo 2010) – in considering the liminal space of human/non-human and the girl/woman maturation process through which the novel develops.
References
- Adami, Valentina. 2019. ‘The pedagogical value of young-adult speculative fiction: Teaching environmental justice through Julie Bertagna’s Exodus’. Pólemos 13 (1): 127–47. https://doi.org/10.1515/pol-2019-0007
- Alaimo, Stacy. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Chiesa Isnardi, Gianna. 1991. I miti nordici. Milano: Longanesi.
- Curry, Alice. 2010. ‘The pale trees shook, although no wind blew, and it seemed to Tristan that they shook in anger. “Blind space” and ecofeminism in a post-colonial reading of Neil Gaiman and Charles Vess’s graphic novel Stardust (1998)’. Barnboken 33 (2): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.14811/clr.v33i2.16
- Curry, Alice. 2013. Environmental Crisis in Young Adult Fiction. A Poetics of Earth. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137270115
- Gaard, Greta. 2009. ‘Children’s environmental literature. From ecocriticism to ecopedagogy’. Neohelicon 36: 321–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-009-0003-7
- Garrard, Greg. 2004. Ecocriticism: The New Critical Idiom. New York: Routledge. nhttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203644843
- Goga, Nina. 2018a. ‘Bærekraftig litteraturundervisning’. In Ruth Seierstad Stokke and Elise Seip Tønnessen (eds). Møter med barnelitteratur: Introduksjon for lærere. Oslo: Oslo Universitetsforlag. pp. 351–69.
- Goga, Nina. 2018b. ‘Økofantasy. Frida Nilssons Ishavspirater’ In Svein Slettan (ed.) Fantastisk litteratur for barn og unge. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. pp. 77–91
- Head L., J. Atchison and C. Phillips. 2014. ‘Vegetal politics: belonging, practices and places’. Social and Cultural Geography 15 (8): 861–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.973900
- Jones, Verity and Catherine MacLeod. 2022. ‘Why children need to read about plants at a time of climate change’. Children’s Literature in Education 53 (3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-022-09511-x
- Kokkola, Lydia. 2017. ‘Critical plant studies and children’s literature’. In Clémentine Beauvais and Maria Nikolajeva (eds). The Edinburgh Companion to Children’s Literature. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 274–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474414647-022
- Laist, Randy. 2013. Plants and Literature: Essays in Critical Plant Studies. Leiden: Brill https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209991
- Leder, Drew. 1990. The Absent Body. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Massey, Geraldine and Clare Bradford. 2011. ‘Children as ecocitizens: Ecocriticism and environmental texts.’ In Kerry Mallan and Clare Bradford (eds). Contemporary Children’s Literature and Film: Engaging with Theory. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-34530-0_7
- Pettersen, Siri. 2021. Odin’s Child. New York: Arctis US.
- Plumwood, Val. 1992. ‘Ecosocial feminism as a general theory of oppression’. In C. Merchant (ed.) Ecology. Amherst: Prometheus. pp. 223–35.
- Ryan, John C. 2018. Plants in Contemporary Poetry: Ecocriticism and the Botanical Imagination. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315643953
- Teigland, Anne-Stefi. 2014. ‘Fantasy’. In Svein Slettan (ed.) Ungdomslitteratur – ei innføring. Oslo: Cappelen Damm AS. pp. 99–111.
- Vakoch, Douglas A. 2011. Ecofeminism and Rhetoric. Critical Perspectives on Sex, Technology, and Discourse. New York: Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qcnk8
- Vakoch, D.A. and S. Mickey. 2018. Ecofeminism in Dialogue. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
- Van Gennep, Arnold. 2019. The Rites of Passage. Trans. by Monika B. Vizedom and Gabrielle L. Caffee. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Wandersee, J. and E. Schussler. 1999. ‘Preventing plant blindness’. The American Biology Teacher 61: 84–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450624
- Wandersee, J. and E. Schussler. 2001. ‘Toward a theory of plant blindness’. Plant Science Bulletin 47 (1): 2–9.