Forthcoming
Research Articles

Chicanx Cannabis Relationships: Cultural and Political Histories of Cannabis Resistance

Magaly Ordonez
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Published 2025-01-15

Keywords

  • Cannabis relationships,
  • Chicanx feminisms,
  • critical cannabis studies,
  • cannabis ethnobotany

How to Cite

Magaly Ordonez. 2025. “Chicanx Cannabis Relationships: Cultural and Political Histories of Cannabis Resistance”. Plant Perspectives, January. https://doi.org/10.3197/WHPPP.63845494909749.

Abstract

This article focuses on interdisciplinary feminist cannabis research that prioritises the cannabis relationships and spaces in Chicanx/Latinx communities. The interdisciplinary approach I take builds from the fields of ethnic studies, Chicanx feminisms, environmental humanities and critical cannabis studies. I offer a history of cannabis ethnobotany to understand the cultural and medicinal approaches to cannabis from a queer trans Chicanx feminist positionality. Signaling to a Chicanx cannabis history that exposes racial cannabis politics dating back to the early twentieth century in the US, I build from this history to share cannabis futures grounded in Chicanx environmental perspectives. There is a need for cannabis research because human-plant relationships are currently tethered to extraction and profit, as is visible in current cannabis industries.

References

  1. Abrams, D.I. 1998. ‘Medical marijuana: Tribulations and trials’. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 30 (2): 163–169.
  2. Aguilar-Hernández, J.M. and C. Cruz. 2020. ‘Grounding emerging scholarship on queer/trans* Chicana/o/x and Latina/o/x pedagogies’. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal 14 (2): 5–22.
  3. Aldama, A.J. and N.H. Quiñonez. 2002. Decolonial Voices: Chicana and Chicano Cultural Studies in the 21st Century. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  4. Anzaldúa, G. 2022. Borderlands/la Frontera: The New Mestiza. Fifth Edition. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
  5. Anzaldúa, G. 2009. ‘To(o) Queer the writer – loca, escritora y chicana’. In G. Anzaldúa and A. Keating (eds.), The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader, pp. 163–175. Durham: Duke University Press.
  6. Anzaldúa, G. and A. Keating. 2015. Light in the dark = Luz en lo oscuro: Rewriting identity, spirituality, reality. Durham: Duke University Press.
  7. Arvin, M., E. Tuck and A. Morrill. 2013. ‘Decolonizing Feminism: Challenging connections between settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy’. Feminist Formations 25 (1): 8–34.
  8. Balant, M., A. Gras, M. Ruz, J. Valles, et al. 2021. ‘Traditional uses of Cannabis: An analysis of the CANNUSE database’. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 279 (114362).
  9. Becker, H.S. 1953. ‘Becoming a marihuana user’. The American Journal of Sociology 59 (3): 235–242’.
  10. Benedict, G., A. Sabbagh and T. Conermann. 2022. ‘Medical cannabis used as an alternative treatment for chronic pain demonstrates reduction in chronic opioid use – a prospective study’. Pain Physician 25 (1): E113–E119.
  11. Bonnie, R.J. and C.H. Whitebread II. 1974. ‘Alien Weed’. In The Marihuana Conviction; A History of Marihuana Prohibition in The United States, pp. 32–52. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
  12. Braitstein P., T. Kendall, K. Chan, E. Wood et al. 2001. ‘Mary-Jane and her patients: Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of HIV-positive individuals using medical marijuana and antiretroviral agents’. AIDS 15 (4): 532–533.
  13. Calderón, D., D. Delgado Bernal, L. Pérez Huber, M. Malagón, et al. 2012. ‘A Chicana Feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation later’. Harvard Educational Review 82 (4): 513–529.
  14. Campos, I. 2012. Home Grown: Marijuana and the Origins of Mexico’s War on Drugs. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  15. Cahuas, M.C. 2022. ‘Voicing Chicanx/Latinx feminisms and situating testimonio in geographical research’. Gender, Place & Culture 29 (11): 1514–1527.
  16. Cahuas, M.C., G. Douglass-Jaimes, C. Faiver-Serna, Y. González Mendoza, et al. 2023. ‘Latinx geographies: Opening conversations’. ACME An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 22 (6): 1462–89.
  17. Caraves, J. 2020. ‘Centering the “T”: Envisioning a Trans Jotería Pedagogy’. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal 14 (2).
  18. Clarke, R.C. and M.D. Merlin. 2013. Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  19. Chaachouaya, N., A. Azerouala, B. Bencharkia, A. Douirab et al. 2023. ‘Cannabis sativa L.: A review on traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, and pharmacological aspects’. Traditional and Integrative Medicine 8 (1): 97–116.
  20. Chavez, M.S. 2012. ‘Autoethnography, a chicana’s methodological research tool: The role of storytelling for those who have no choice but to do critical race theory’. Equity & Excellence in Education 45 (2): 334–48.
  21. Craven, C. and D.A. Davis. 2013. ‘Feminist activist ethnography’. In C. Christa and D.A. Davis (eds) Feminist Activist Ethnography Counterpoints to Neoliberalism in North America, pp. 1–22. Lanham: Lexington Books.
  22. Cox, P.A. and M.J. Balick. 1994. ‘The ethnobotanical approach to drug discovery’. Scientific American 270 (6):82–87.
  23. Crocq, M.A. 2020. ‘History of cannabis and the endocannabinoid system’. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 22 (3): 223–28.
  24. Cuevas, T.J. 2018. Post-Borderlandia: Chicana literature and gender variant critique. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  25. Davalos, K.M. 2018. ‘Review: Sin Vergüenza: Chicana feminist theorizing’. Feminist Studies 34 (1/2), The Chicana Studies Issue (Spring/Summer): 151–171
  26. Davalos, K.M. 1998. ‘Chicana/o Studies and Anthropology: The dialogue that never was’. Aztlán 23 (2): 13–45.
  27. DeGuzmán, M. 2019. ‘LatinX botanical epistemologies’. Cultural Dynamics 31(1-2): 108–124.
  28. Dicochea, P.R. 2004. ‘Chicana critical rhetoric: Recrafting la causa in Chicana movement discourse, 1970–1979’. Frontiers 25 (1): 77–92.
  29. Dillis, C., M. Petersen-Rockney and M. Polson. 2024. ‘A theory of geo-social marginalization: A case study of the licensed cannabis industry in California’. Journal of Environmental Management 355: 120396.
  30. Duarte, M.E. and M. Belarde-Lewis. 2015. ‘Imagining: Creating spaces for Indigenous ontologies’. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 53: 677-702.
  31. Dudley, E. 2014. ‘The nation’s first marijuana raid likely happened in Los Angeles’. Off Ramp. 89.3KPCC. Published September 19. https://www.scpr.org/programs/offramp/2014/09/19/39399/the-nation-s-first-marijuana-raid-likely-happened/
  32. Elkrief, L., G. Bastien, C. McAnulty, H. Bakouni, et al. 2023. ‘Differential effect of cannabis use on opioid agonist treatment outcomes: Exploratory analyses from the OPTIMA study’. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment 149: 209031–209031.
  33. Elenes, C. A. 2000 . ‘Chicana feminist narratives and the politics of the self’. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 21 (3): 105–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3347113.
  34. Espinoza, D. 2007. ‘Chicana Movement’. In F. Malti-Douglas (ed.), Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender: Culture Society History, pp. 265–266. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.
  35. Espinoza, D., M.E. Cotera and M. Blackwell (eds). 2018. Chicana Movidas: New Narratives of Activism and Feminism in The Movement Era. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  36. Fordjour, E., C.F. Manful, A.A. Sey, R. Javed, et al. 2023. ‘Cannabis: A multifaceted plant with endless potentials.’ Frontiers in Pharmacology 14: 1200269.
  37. Galarte, F.J. 2021. Brown Trans Figurations: Rethinking Race, Gender and Sexuality in Chicanx/Latinx Studies. First edition. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
  38. Garcia, A.M. 1989. ‘The development of Chicana feminist discourse, 1970-1980’. Gender and Society 3 (2): 217–38.
  39. García Peña, L. 2020. ‘Dismantling anti-blackness together’. The Latinx Project and North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA). Published June 8. https://www.latinxproject.nyu.edu/intervenxions/nbspdismantling-anti-blackness-together?rq=latinidad
  40. Gieringer, D.H. 1999. ‘The forgotten origins of cannabis prohibition in California’. Contemporary Drug Problems 26 (2): 237–288.
  41. Gould, D. 2002. ‘Life during wartime: Emotions and the development of ACT UP’. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 7 (2): 177–200.
  42. Gude. Zoom Interview by Magaly Ordoñez. Conducted 15 March 2022.
  43. Guerra, S.I. 2022. ‘The drug war, drug reform and the Latinx community: An ethnographic perspective from the Texas-Mexico border and Colorado’. In A.M Dávila (ed.), Albuquerque Ethnographic Refusals, Unruly Latinidades, pp. 135–152. University of New Mexico Press.
  44. Hall, K.Q. 2011. Feminist Disability Studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011. https://primo.lib.umn.edu/permalink/f/1hd9g29/UMN_ALMA51828617790001701
  45. Heidenreich, L. 2020. Nepantla Squared: Transgender Mestiz@ Histories in Times of Global Shift. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
  46. Hourfane, S., H. Mechqoq, A.Y. Bekkali, J.M. Rocha et al. 2023. ‘A comprehensive review on cannabis sativa ethnobotany, phytochemistry, molecular docking and biological activities’. Plants 12 (6): 1245.
  47. Hudak, J. 2016. Marijuana as Enemy: Foreign and Domestic, in Marijuana: A Short History, pp. 41–48. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  48. Iftikhar, A., U. Zafar, W. Ahmed, M.A. Shabbir, et al. 2021. ‘Applications of Cannabis sativa L. in food and its therapeutic potential: From a prohibited drug to a nutritional supplement’. Molecules 26 (24): 7699.
  49. Johnson, N. 2017. ‘Workers’ weed: Cannabis, sugar beets and landscapes of labor in the American West, 1900–1946’. Agricultural History 91 (3):320–341.
  50. Juan Ines. Zoom Interview by Magaly Ordoñez. Conducted 2 February 2022
  51. Karuka, M. 2019 Empire’s Tracks: Indigenous Nations, Chinese Workers and the Transcontinental Railroad. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  52. Kuetzal. Zoom Interview by Magaly Ordoñez. Conducted 29 January 2022
  53. Kun, J. and L. Pulido. 2014. ‘Introduction’. In Black and Brown in Los Angeles: Beyond Conflict and Coalition, 1–30. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  54. Lamphere, L. 2016. ‘Feminist anthropology engages social movements: Theory, ethnography and activism,’ In E. Lewin and L.M. Silverstein (eds), Mapping Feminist Anthropology in the Twenty-First Century. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
  55. Lucas, P. 2014. ‘Rationale for cannabis-based interventions in the opioid overdose crisis’. Harm Reduction Journal 14: 1–6.
  56. Lyons, A.J., G. Kordas, E.T. Smith, M. Wilson, et al. 2023. ‘Cannabis for healing in a native community clinic: Development and results from an informatics research tool’. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs:1–9.
  57. McClaurin, I. 2001. ‘Feminist self in anthropology: Toward an autoethnographic approach’. In Black Feminist Anthropology: Theory, Politics, Praxis and Poetics. Rutgers University Press.
  58. McPartland, L.M. and Pruitt, P.L. 1997. ‘Medical marijuana and its use by the immunocompromised’. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 3 (3): 39–45.
  59. Miranda, A.A. 2022. ‘Ethnographic borders and crossings: Critical ethnography, intersectionality, and blurring the boundaries of insider research’. Latino Studies 20 (3): 351–67.
  60. MJBizDaily. 2022. ‘Special Report: Diversity, Equity & Inclusion in the Cannabis Industry’.
  61. Moussawi, G. 2021. ‘Bad feelings: On trauma, nonlinear time and accidental encounters in “the field’. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research 10 (1):78–96.
  62. National Institute on Drug Abuse. 2024 ‘How does marijuana use affect school, work and social life?’ National Institute on Drug Abuse, 25 May. https://archives.nida.nih.gov/publications/research-reports/marijuana/how-does-marijuana-use-affect-school-work-social-life
  63. Ordoñez, M. 2024. ‘Are cannabis social equity programs truly equitable?’ 13 February, https://genderpolicyreport.umn.edu/are-cannabis-social-equity-programs-truly-equitable/
  64. Ordoñez, M. 2024. ‘Immigrant women in cannabis farming endure exploitation’. 14 May, https://genderpolicyreport.umn.edu/immigrant-women-in-cannabis-farming-endure-exploitation/
  65. Pelaez Lopez, A. 2018. ‘The X in latinx is a wound, not a trend’. ColorBloq: The Stories of Us. From the X Collection. September. https://www.colorbloq.org/the-x-in-latinx-is-a-wound-not-a-trend
  66. Pellow, D.N. 2021. ‘Critical environmental justice studies’. In Environmental Justice. First edition, pp. 225–33. London: Routledge.
  67. Pisanti, S. and M. Bifulco. 2018. ‘Medical cannabis: A plurimillennial history of an evergreen’ Journal of Cellular Physiology 234 (6): 8342-8351.
  68. Prentiss, D. et al. 2004. ‘Patterns of marijuana use among patients with HIV/AIDS followed in a public health care setting’. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 35 (1): 38–45.
  69. Reed, K. 2023 Settler Cannabis: From Gold Rush to Green Rush in Indigenous Northern California. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  70. Reed, K. 2018. ‘Operation Yurok and the environmental impacts of marijuana in Yurok country’. News from Native California 31 (3) (Spring): 30.
  71. Reinarman, C. and P. Cohen. 2007. ‘Law, culture and cannabis: Comparing use patterns in Amsterdam and San Francisco’. In E. Mitch (ed.), Pot Politics: Marijuana and the Costs of Prohibition, 113–132. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  72. Rosic, T., R. Kapoor, B. Panesar, L. Naji, et al. 2021. ‘The association between cannabis use and outcome in pharmacological treatment for opioid use disorder’. Harm Reduction Journal 18 (24): 1–9.
  73. Russel y Rodriguez, M. 1998. ‘Confronting anthropology’s silencing praxis: speaking of/from a chicana consciousness’. Qualitative Inquiry 4 (1): 15–40.
  74. Russel y Rodríguez, M. 2007. ‘Messy spaces: Chicana testimonio and the undisciplining of ethnography’. Chicana/Latina Studies 7 (1): 86–121.
  75. Sargent, M. 2022. ‘Should you smoke weed out of an aluminium can?’ CannaConnection. Lifestyle and Culture. Last updated, 18 November. https://www.cannaconnection.com/blog/11067-smoking-weed-with-aluminium-can-pipe-a-bad-idea
  76. Schnabel, L. and E. Sevell. 2017. ‘Should Mary and Jane be legal? Americans’ attitudes toward marijuana and same-sex marriage legalization, 1988–2014’. Public Opinion Quarterly 81 (1): 157–172.
  77. Simpson, A. 2016. ‘The state is a man: Theresa Spence, Loretta Saunders and the gender of settler sovereignty’. Theory and Event 19 (4),
  78. Siraj, J. 2022. ‘Ethnobotany’. In S. Kumar (ed.), Medicinal Plants, pp. 29–50. London: IntechOpen.
  79. Socías, M.E., E. Wood, S. Lake, S. Nolan, et al. 2018. ‘High‐intensity cannabis use is associated with retention in opioid agonist treatment: a longitudinal analysis’. Addiction 113 (12): 2250–2258.
  80. Turner, N.J., P. Spalding and D. Deur. 2020 ‘Introduction: Making a place for Indigenous botanical knowledge and environmental values in land-use planning and decision making. In N. Turner (ed.), Plants, People and Places: The Roles of Ethnobotany and Ethnoecology in Indigenous Peoples’ Land Rights in Canada and Beyond, pp. 3–32 Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  81. Valdez, A. and C.D. Kaplan. 2019. ‘Deconstructing US marijuana prohibition policies in the early twentieth century: An intersectional theoretical approach’ Aztlan: A Journal of Chicano Studies 44 (1):111–140.
  82. Wiese, B. and A.R. Wilson-Poe. 2018. ‘Emerging evidence for cannabis’ role in opioid use disorder’. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 3 (1): 179–189.
  83. Zepeda, S. 2023. ‘Xicana/x Indígena futures: Re-rooting through traditional medicines’. Feminist Formations 35 (1): 117–31.