Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020)
Peer Reviewed Articles

Measuring net environmental impact from population growth and alternative energy

Travis Edwards
University of Kansas
Bio
Luis Gautier
The University of Texas at Tyler
This image of the cover of this issue of The Journal of Population and Sustainability has the title in block letters on a grey-green background.

Published 2020-06-01

Keywords

  • environmental forecasting,
  • environmental impact,
  • green economics,
  • population growth,
  • renewable energy

How to Cite

Edwards, Travis, and Luis Gautier. 2020. “Measuring Net Environmental Impact from Population Growth and Alternative Energy”. The Journal of Population and Sustainability 4 (2):67–87. https://doi.org/10.3197/jps.2020.4.2.67.

Abstract

Existing research on the relationship between economic growth and environmental impact has produced mixed results. Also, there has been a lack of attention on the effect of population, and per capita measures are used rather than total pollution. To address this gap, we analyze the role of population and alternative energy on the environment using total carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) in the United States. We propose a new model integrating population demographics into the Environmental Kuznets Curve, and then apply this framework to an empirical analysis. The effect of population and immigration on total CO2 is estimated, as well as the level of alternative energy use required to overcome increasing environmental pressure. Results suggest population and immigration growth may lead to an increase in total CO2 growth, but alternative energy may lower total CO2 growth after a threshold. Further, immigration and total CO2 growth exhibit a nonlinear relationship. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Atasoy, B., 2017. Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across the U.S.: evidence from panel mean group estimators. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 77, pp. 731–47.
  2. Baldini, M. and Jacobsen, H.K., 2016. Optimal trade-offs between energy efficiency improvements and additional renewable energy supply: a review of international experiences. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2016 13th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM). Porto, Portugal , 6-9 June 2016. New York, NY: IEEE.
  3. Baldwin, R., 1995. Does sustainability require growth?. In: I. Golden and
  4. L.A. Winters eds. The Economics of Sustainable Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 51–78. Beckerman, W., 1992. Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? whose environment? World Development. 20(4), 1992, pp. 481–96.
  5. BP, 2019. Statistical Review-2019-The US energy market in 2018. [pdf] London: British Petroleum Co. Available at: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2019-us-insights.pdf [Accessed 20 February 2020].
  6. Cafaro, P. and Gotmark, G., 2019. The potential environmental impacts of EU immigration policy: future population numbers, greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity preservation. The Journal of Population and Sustainability. 4(1), pp. 71–101.
  7. Cafaro, P. and Staples, W., 2009. The environmental argument for reducing immigration into the United States. Environmental Ethics. 31(1), pp. 5–30.
  8. Carson, R., 2010. The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Seeking empirical regularity and theoretical structure. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 4(1), pp. 3–23.
  9. Carson, R., Jeon, Y. and McCubbin, D., 1997. The relationship between air pollution emissions and income: US Data. Environment and Development Economics. 2(4), pp. 433–50.
  10. Casey, G. and Galor, O., 2017. Is faster economic growth compatible with reductions in carbon emissions? The role of diminished population growth. Environmental Research Letters. 12, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/12/1/014003.
  11. Caviglia-Harrisa, J., Chambersa, D. and Kahn, J., 2009. Taking the “U” out of Kuznets: a comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecological Economics. 68(4), pp. 1149–59.
  12. Chowdhury, R. and Moran, E., 2012. Turning the curve: a critical review of the Kuznets approaches. Applied Geography. 32(1), pp. 3–11.
  13. Clack, C., Qvist, S., Apt, J., Bazilian, M., Brandt, A., Caldeira, K., Davis, S., Diakov, V., Handschy, M., Hines, P., Jaramillo, P., Kammen, D., Long, J., Granger M., Morgan, Reed, A., Sivaram, V., Sweeney, J., Tynan, G., Victor, D., Weyant, J. and Whitacre J., 2017. Evaluation of 100% wind, water, and solar power. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(26), pp. 6722–27.
  14. Curran, S. and Sherbinin, A., 2004. Completing the picture: the challenges of bringing “consumption” into the population-environment equation. Population and Environment. 26(2), pp. 107–31.
  15. Dogan, E. and Ozturk, I., 2017. The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 24(11), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8786-y.
  16. Ehrlich, P.R. and Holdren, J.P., 1971. Impact of population growth. Science, New Series. 171(3977), pp. 1212–17.
  17. Figge, F., Young, W. and Barkemeyer, R., 2014. Sufficiency or efficiency to achieve lower resource consumption and emissions? The role of the rebound effect. Journal of Cleaner Production. 69, pp. 216–24.
  18. Franklin, R.S. and Ruth, M., 2012. Growing up and cleaning up: the environmental Kuznets curve redux. Applied Geography. 32, pp. 29–39.
  19. Galeotti, M., Lanza, A. and Piccoli, M.C.L., 2011. The demographic transition and the ecological transition: Enriching the Environmental Kuznets Curve. IEFE Working Paper No. 44. [online] Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1922594 [Accessed 10 October 2019].
  20. Gillingham, K., Rapson D. and Wagner, G., 2016. The rebound effect and energy efficiency policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 10(1), pp. 68–88.
  21. Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B., 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 3914. [online] Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w3914 [Accessed 10 October 2019].
  22. Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B., 1995. Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110(2), pp. 353–77.
  23. Holtz-Eakin, D. and Selden, T., 1992. Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4248. [online] Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w4248 [Accessed 10 October 2019].
  24. Jacobson, M., Delucchi, M., Bauer, Z., Goodman, S., Chapman, W., Cameron, M., Bozonnat, C., Chobadi, L., Clonts, H., Enevoldsen, P., Erwin, J., Fobi, S., Goldstrom, O., Hennessy, E., Liu, J., Lo, J., Meyer, C., Morris, S., Moy, K., O’Neill, P., Petkov, I., Redfern, S., Schucker, R., Sontag, M., Wang, J., Weiner, E. and Yachanin, A., 2017. 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 countries of the world. Joule. 1(1), pp. 108–21.
  25. Jacobson, M., Delucchi, M., Bazouin, G., Bauer, Z., Heavey, C., Fisher, E., Morris S., Piekutowski, D., Vencill, T. and Yeskoo, T., 2015. 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States. Energy Environmental Science 8. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE01283J.
  26. Jevons, W.S., 1866. The Coal Question. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
  27. Jones, G. and Warner, K., 2016. The 21st century population-energy-climate nexus. Energy Policy. 93, pp. 206–12.
  28. Kuznets, S., 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review. 45(1), pp. 1–28.
  29. List, J. and Gallet, C., 1999. The environmental Kuznets curve: Does one size fit all?. Ecological Economics. 31(3), pp. 409–23.
  30. Madlener, R. and Alcott, B., 2009. Energy rebound and economic growth: a review of the main issues and research needs. Energy. 34(3), pp. 370–76.
  31. Malthus, T., 1798. An essay on the principle of population. Reprint, 2nd ed., 1992. Edited with an introduction by Donald Winch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J. and Behrens III, W., 1972. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
  33. Mitchell, R., 2012. Technology is not enough: climate change, population, affluence, and consumption. The Journal of Environment and Development. 21(1), pp. 24–27.
  34. O’Neill, B.C., Liddle, B., Jiang, L., Smith, K.R., Pachauri, S., Dalton, M. and Fuchs, R., 2012. Demographic change and carbon dioxide emissions. The Lancet. 380(9837), pp. 157–64.
  35. Roser, M., Ritchie, H. and Ortiz-Ospina, E., 2019. World Population Growth., 2019. Our World in Data. [online] Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/worldpopulation-growth [Accessed 10 October 2019].
  36. Rupasingha, A., Coetz, S., Debertin, D. and Pagoulatos, A., 2004. The environmental Kuznets curve for US counties: A spatial econometric analysis with extensions. Papers in Regional Science. 83(2), pp. 407–24.
  37. Sandmo, A., 2015. The early history of environmental economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 9(1), pp. 43–63.
  38. Shafik, N. and Bandyopadhya, S., 1992. Economic growth and environmental quality: Time-series and cross-country evidence. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Number 904. [online] Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/904.html [Accessed 10 October 2019].
  39. Sorrell, S., Gatersleben, B. and Druckman, A., 2020. The limits of energy sufficiency: A review of the evidence for rebound effects and negative spillovers from behavioural change. Energy Research & Social Science. 64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101439.
  40. Soytas, U., Sari, R. and Ewing, B., 2007. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics. 62, (3–4), pp. 482–89.
  41. Stern, D., 2003. The Environmental Kuznets Curve. [pdf] Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics. International Society for Ecological Economics. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Stern/publication/237780646_International_Society_for_Ecological_Economics_Internet_Encyclopaedia_of_Ecological_Economics/links/0deec52743a9796717000000/International-Societyfor-Ecological-Economics-Internet-Encyclopaedia-of-Ecological-Economics.pdf [Accessed 10 October 2019].
  42. The World Bank, 2018. World Development Indicators, United States. [online] Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states?view=chart [Accessed 10 October 2019].
  43. United Nations, 2015. International Migration Report. [pdf] New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/MigrationReport2015_Highlights.pdf [Accessed 10 October 2019].
  44. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2019. Energy Facts. [online] Washington D.C.: U.S. Energy Information Administration. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/us-energy-facts/ [Accessed 20 February 2020].
  45. Vespa, J., Armstrong, D. and Medina, L., 2018. Demographic Turning Points for the United States: Population Projections for 2020 to 2060. [pdf] Washington D.C.: United States Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2018/demo/P25_1144.pdf [Accessed 10 October 2019].
  46. York, R., Rosa, E. and Dietz, T., 2003. A rift in modernity? Assessing the anthropogenic sources of global climate change with the STIRPAT model. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 23(10), pp. 31–51.
  47. Weber, H. and Sciubba, J.D., 2018. The Effect of Population Growth on the Environment: Evidence from European Regions. European Journal of population. 35(2), pp. 379–402.
  48. Zhou, Y. and Liu, Y., 2016. Does population have a larger impact on carbon dioxide emissions than income? Evidence from a cross-regional panel analysis in China. Applied Energy. 180, pp. 800–09.